Monte Cook Back to Work
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Serious Badass
- Posts: 29894
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Monte Cook Back to Work
So it's kind of lost in a thread that Shadzar crapped all over, but Monte Cook is back to work at Wizards of the Coast. They say they are bringing him in for R&D, but his first assignment is taking over the weekly column where Mike Mearls ruminates on design and hands out deepities to try to convince people that he knows what he is doing. There are a lot of things that could mean.
It could mean that they are preparing to give Mike Mearls the boot, as they are grooming Monte Cook to be the face they are presenting to the world. It could mean that they are trying to buy themselves 3rd and 2nd edition legitimacy by giving Monte Cook a meaningless position for a few ducats . It could mean that they are trying to fight back against Paizo by rehiring free agents that got name recognition on Pathfinder products. It could be that Mike Mearls was simply running out of profound sounding bullshit to say and wanted to hand the task over to someone else. We don't know, and we won't know until some time in the medium future because Monte Cook hasn't actually released any of those stupid columns yet.
But let's talk a bit about Monte Cook. He was integral to the development of 3rd edition Dungeons & Dragons, the best edition the game has ever seen. His 2nd edition work was also pretty good for the time. He is obviously capable of writing stuff that is stone cold awesome. He has done it before. But honestly: what has he done for me lately? And by lately: I mean the last ten fucking years.
From Monte Cook's World of Darkness to Monte Cook Presents Incomprehensible and Unbalanced Options, Monte Cook hasn't shown that he can put out a supplement that is playable or even coherent in some time. Furthermore: from his discussions of being angry that 3.5 dropped the shitastic rule that losing prereqs made you lose a prestige class benefits (despite you know, having personally written the Ur Priest and Dragon Disciple) to his meandering thoughts on "rewarding system mastery" (by purposefully including trap options) to his public support of Sean K Reynolds, the man has basically been a non-stop gaff machine since shortly after Clinton was president.
So speculate away. Monte Cook is going back to work for Wizards after a nine year absence. What the fuck do we think that means? I think it makes me more hopeful about 5e. But I am not sure.
-Username17
It could mean that they are preparing to give Mike Mearls the boot, as they are grooming Monte Cook to be the face they are presenting to the world. It could mean that they are trying to buy themselves 3rd and 2nd edition legitimacy by giving Monte Cook a meaningless position for a few ducats . It could mean that they are trying to fight back against Paizo by rehiring free agents that got name recognition on Pathfinder products. It could be that Mike Mearls was simply running out of profound sounding bullshit to say and wanted to hand the task over to someone else. We don't know, and we won't know until some time in the medium future because Monte Cook hasn't actually released any of those stupid columns yet.
But let's talk a bit about Monte Cook. He was integral to the development of 3rd edition Dungeons & Dragons, the best edition the game has ever seen. His 2nd edition work was also pretty good for the time. He is obviously capable of writing stuff that is stone cold awesome. He has done it before. But honestly: what has he done for me lately? And by lately: I mean the last ten fucking years.
From Monte Cook's World of Darkness to Monte Cook Presents Incomprehensible and Unbalanced Options, Monte Cook hasn't shown that he can put out a supplement that is playable or even coherent in some time. Furthermore: from his discussions of being angry that 3.5 dropped the shitastic rule that losing prereqs made you lose a prestige class benefits (despite you know, having personally written the Ur Priest and Dragon Disciple) to his meandering thoughts on "rewarding system mastery" (by purposefully including trap options) to his public support of Sean K Reynolds, the man has basically been a non-stop gaff machine since shortly after Clinton was president.
So speculate away. Monte Cook is going back to work for Wizards after a nine year absence. What the fuck do we think that means? I think it makes me more hopeful about 5e. But I am not sure.
-Username17
- Psychic Robot
- Prince
- Posts: 4607
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 10:47 pm
Well;
Monte Cook as a "BIG IDEAS" guy is pretty good. Its only when he gets to start doing things like determining how edge cases should be handeled that he turns into a bastard (i.e. the prestige class thing).
On the other hand, he is not particularly visionary.
Cook doesn't do anything for me until I start seeing products. Then again, as a person who likes 4E I am mostly interested to see if 5E is a game that tries to build on things that were good in 3E and 4E, or if hiring cook is the first step towards reverting the game to a fighters suck wizards rule version of the game.
Monte Cook as a "BIG IDEAS" guy is pretty good. Its only when he gets to start doing things like determining how edge cases should be handeled that he turns into a bastard (i.e. the prestige class thing).
On the other hand, he is not particularly visionary.
Cook doesn't do anything for me until I start seeing products. Then again, as a person who likes 4E I am mostly interested to see if 5E is a game that tries to build on things that were good in 3E and 4E, or if hiring cook is the first step towards reverting the game to a fighters suck wizards rule version of the game.
I don't think that WotC are paying him more than Paizo just for writing those useless columns. They are saying that:
Emphasis mine. But then, checked the WotC forums and the 4rries say that WotC said that they weren't gearing for 5th edition 6 weeks ago. So take that as you will.Monte has an unmatched design pedigree in the RPG field, and for that reason we've brought him on board to work with R&Din making D&D the greatest RPG the world has seen.
He barely did anything with the Pathfinder RPG; they just ran a few ideas by him (and presumably he responded with sage beard-stroking or whatever). Here's Erik Mona's comment.Psychic Robot wrote:it means paizo wasn't paying him enough
I assume he'll fill a similar role at WotC.
Last edited by hogarth on Tue Sep 20, 2011 6:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- King
- Posts: 5271
- Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 5:32 am
A new, Essentials specific campaign setting? Maybe they'll just rape the shit out of Planescape or Birthright and repackage it as a boxed set...
Hard to say what he is up to, really. I'm personally going to be setting the bar pretty high for the standard of his editorial. Unless he can consistantly provide some meaningful insights into his specific role and the future of D&D, I'll be writing his efforts off as a cash grab*.
*I don't have a problem with people whoring themselves out. People gotta pay the bills. It does make me suspicious of their sincerity and motivations though.
Hard to say what he is up to, really. I'm personally going to be setting the bar pretty high for the standard of his editorial. Unless he can consistantly provide some meaningful insights into his specific role and the future of D&D, I'll be writing his efforts off as a cash grab*.
*I don't have a problem with people whoring themselves out. People gotta pay the bills. It does make me suspicious of their sincerity and motivations though.
- RadiantPhoenix
- Prince
- Posts: 2668
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 10:33 pm
- Location: Trudging up the Hill
-
- Duke
- Posts: 1040
- Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 8:33 am
Cook also wrote some PF adventures for Paizo.hogarth wrote:He barely did anything with the Pathfinder RPG; they just ran a few ideas by him (and presumably he responded with sage beard-stroking or whatever). Here's Erik Mona's comment.
I wish in the past I had tried more things 'cause now I know that being in trouble is a fake idea
I know he wrote "Curse of the Riven Sky". Were there other ones, too?A Man In Black wrote:Cook also wrote some PF adventures for Paizo.hogarth wrote:He barely did anything with the Pathfinder RPG; they just ran a few ideas by him (and presumably he responded with sage beard-stroking or whatever). Here's Erik Mona's comment.
- Josh_Kablack
- King
- Posts: 5318
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
- Location: Online. duh
Monte had his name on some books with wonkier mechanics back in his ICE days. He is not on the very short list of designers who would restore my confidence just by (re)hiring.
But I won't argue that D&D has been run by folks who seem to have had notably less confidence since Mr. Cook left the 3e line.
So, sign me up for cautious optimism.
But I won't argue that D&D has been run by folks who seem to have had notably less confidence since Mr. Cook left the 3e line.
So, sign me up for cautious optimism.
Last edited by Josh_Kablack on Tue Sep 20, 2011 11:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"But transportation issues are social-justice issues. The toll of bad transit policies and worse infrastructure—trains and buses that don’t run well and badly serve low-income neighborhoods, vehicular traffic that pollutes the environment and endangers the lives of cyclists and pedestrians—is borne disproportionately by black and brown communities."
BTW, the WotC forums are so cute right now, "Wizards said that they weren't writing 5th 6 MONTHS AGO, so they couldn't have lied, right?"
Denial, not just a river on Egypt.
The shitstorm is brewing. Brace yourselves for when they hammer falls and they announce D&D 5th edition. The Internet will explode.
Also, I'm totally enjoying this.
Denial, not just a river on Egypt.
The shitstorm is brewing. Brace yourselves for when they hammer falls and they announce D&D 5th edition. The Internet will explode.
Also, I'm totally enjoying this.
The one thing I really remember Monte Cook for is putting variant rules on his website to make giant bugs actually bugs (giving them tremorsense, resistance or immunity to crits, etc.)
Also... I think it's his name that's on BoVD, which is mechanically useful, if awful flavourwise, so I suppose I'm cautiously optimistic as well.
Also... I think it's his name that's on BoVD, which is mechanically useful, if awful flavourwise, so I suppose I'm cautiously optimistic as well.
Cuz apparently I gotta break this down for you dense motherfuckers- I'm trans feminine nonbinary. My pronouns are they/them.
Winnah wrote:No, No. 'Prak' is actually a Thri Kreen impersonating a human and roleplaying himself as a D&D character. All hail our hidden insect overlords.
FrankTrollman wrote:In Soviet Russia, cosmic horror is the default state.
You should gain sanity for finding out that the problems of a region are because there are fucking monsters there.
-
- King
- Posts: 6403
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Monty Cook however IS on the very short list of (one) designers who I totally said WOTC would dig out of a hole and prop up in front of 5E for some name recognition.
edit: Here we go...
And as such it means almost nothing that they've dragged him out and propped him in front of the upcoming 5E. Because regardless of what they intend to do with 5E they were always going to tie Monty Cook onto the front of that train.
edit: Here we go...
It's not just a matter of them finding the best designer, it's a matter of finding a designer people recognize, associate with better times, and who they actually can drag out of his hole. Monty is like, very nearly the only guy who fits that bill.Me back in March wrote:Hell has someone dug Monty Cook up from his shallow grave and smuggled him to an undisclosed location for a secret project of some form just for the name recognition lately.
And as such it means almost nothing that they've dragged him out and propped him in front of the upcoming 5E. Because regardless of what they intend to do with 5E they were always going to tie Monty Cook onto the front of that train.
Last edited by PhoneLobster on Wed Sep 21, 2011 2:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
Phonelobster's Self Proclaimed Greatest Hits Collection : (no really, they are awesome)
Phonelobster's Latest RPG Rule Set
The world's most definitive Star Wars Saga Edition Review
That Time I reviewed D20Modern Classes
Stories from Phonelobster's ridiculous life about local gaming stores, board game clubs and brothels
Australia is a horror setting thread
Phonelobster's totally legit history of the island of Malta
The utterly infamous Our Favourite Edition Is 2nd Edition thread
The world's most definitive Star Wars Saga Edition Review
That Time I reviewed D20Modern Classes
Stories from Phonelobster's ridiculous life about local gaming stores, board game clubs and brothels
Australia is a horror setting thread
Phonelobster's totally legit history of the island of Malta
The utterly infamous Our Favourite Edition Is 2nd Edition thread
- Psychic Robot
- Prince
- Posts: 4607
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 10:47 pm
- RadiantPhoenix
- Prince
- Posts: 2668
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 10:33 pm
- Location: Trudging up the Hill
-
- Duke
- Posts: 1545
- Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2009 2:07 am
Well, if I was stuck with one old WotC designer to do 5e, I'd pick Monte because he seems to be the only one who comes up with functional ideas at all.
I mean, he comes up with a lot of shitty ideas too, but with enough playtesters and an iron-fisted editor you can weed out the shitty ones.
His own indie stuff is probably the only thing that ever got close to improving DnD from 3e, even if he doesn't seem to understand presentation, art, theme, branding, or how to tell a story or attract players.
Chain him to a chair and make him pump out rules, then hire a novelist for the fluff and an art director for the presentation. I mean, Paizo's success is entirely because of a great art director (Erik Mona), and it has less than nothing to do with rules.
I mean, he comes up with a lot of shitty ideas too, but with enough playtesters and an iron-fisted editor you can weed out the shitty ones.
His own indie stuff is probably the only thing that ever got close to improving DnD from 3e, even if he doesn't seem to understand presentation, art, theme, branding, or how to tell a story or attract players.
Chain him to a chair and make him pump out rules, then hire a novelist for the fluff and an art director for the presentation. I mean, Paizo's success is entirely because of a great art director (Erik Mona), and it has less than nothing to do with rules.
Last edited by K on Wed Sep 21, 2011 6:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
Oh, definitely. Monte's biggest problem seems to be a philosophy of MOAR!!! More complex, more rules, more pages, etc. I mean, he's the guy that wrote Ptolus, isn't he? And PF's success and appeal is definitely in the artistic break away from the stuffy old shit, and presenting the magepunk style that D&D was supposed to be doing, and sorta did, but PF does much better.K wrote:Well, if I was stuck with one old WotC designer to do 5e, I'd pick Monte because he seems to be the only one who comes up with functional ideas at all.
I mean, he comes up with a lot of shitty ideas too, but with enough playtesters and an iron-fisted editor you can weed out the shitty ones.
His own indie stuff is probably the only thing that ever got close to improving DnD from 3e, even if he doesn't seem to understand presentation, art, theme, branding, or how to tell a story or attract players.
Chain him to a chair and make him pump out rules, then hire a novelist for the fluff and an art director for the presentation. I mean, Paizo's success is entirely because of a great art director (Erik Mona), and it has less than nothing to do with rules.
Cuz apparently I gotta break this down for you dense motherfuckers- I'm trans feminine nonbinary. My pronouns are they/them.
Winnah wrote:No, No. 'Prak' is actually a Thri Kreen impersonating a human and roleplaying himself as a D&D character. All hail our hidden insect overlords.
FrankTrollman wrote:In Soviet Russia, cosmic horror is the default state.
You should gain sanity for finding out that the problems of a region are because there are fucking monsters there.
- OgreBattle
- King
- Posts: 6820
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 9:33 am
Do you think Monte Cook would have done a better job on Tomes than you did?
Do you think Monte Cook has ideas that you would've never thought up of, or execute them better than you possibly can?
I only found out about this board because you guys spent so much effort on trying to fix 3rd edition, so what makes you so happy to see a 3e designer coming back to WotC?
I doubt there's going to be a real system overhaul though like what 2e->3e was. Probably more likely you get more 'variants-that-are-actually-replacements-but-the-old-stuff-is-still-usable' like Essentials. Or how M:tG is in edition... something, the game has changed quite a lot, but all the cards are still the same format.
Do you think Monte Cook has ideas that you would've never thought up of, or execute them better than you possibly can?
I only found out about this board because you guys spent so much effort on trying to fix 3rd edition, so what makes you so happy to see a 3e designer coming back to WotC?
I doubt there's going to be a real system overhaul though like what 2e->3e was. Probably more likely you get more 'variants-that-are-actually-replacements-but-the-old-stuff-is-still-usable' like Essentials. Or how M:tG is in edition... something, the game has changed quite a lot, but all the cards are still the same format.
Last edited by OgreBattle on Wed Sep 21, 2011 6:55 am, edited 2 times in total.
- PoliteNewb
- Duke
- Posts: 1053
- Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2009 1:23 am
- Location: Alaska
- Contact:
Who here has given the impression that they are "so happy"? The best I've heard is very guarded optimism, and most people's praise of Monte is "he isn't as big a dumbass as everyone else who worked on 3E".OgreBattle wrote:I only found out about this board because you guys spent so much effort on trying to fix 3rd edition, so what makes you so happy to see a 3e designer coming back to WotC?
Seriously, no one is clicking their heels about this as far as I can tell.
I am judging the philosophies and decisions you have presented in this thread. The ones I have seen look bad, and also appear to be the fruit of a poisonous tree that has produced only madness and will continue to produce only madness.
--AngelFromAnotherPin
believe in one hand and shit in the other and see which ones fills up quicker. it will be the one you are full of, shit.
--Shadzar
--AngelFromAnotherPin
believe in one hand and shit in the other and see which ones fills up quicker. it will be the one you are full of, shit.
--Shadzar
-
- Serious Badass
- Posts: 29894
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
No matter what you do with a set of house rules, when you grab a pickup game you won't be using them. The better a set of rules are in the actual books (and I literally mean in the books, not whatever the fuck is on page 63 of the online errata document), the more fun I will have if I sit down at a random table in a convention or game store back room. And due to the amount of traveling I do, that's most of my gaming these days.
So if 5e D&D is interesting, whether or not it is balanced or stable, that's great news. Fuck, I don't even really care that much if it's even playable past level 4, since any game that goes on longer than that can be thoroughly house ruled. But the first couple of levels need to be playable and interesting out of the box, because a very large chunk of my personal gaming is going to be exactly that.
4e is boring as fuck. I can't actually stand playing it out of the box. If they make 5e interesting, then I'll be happy. Monte has succeeded in that minimal design goal before, so I am personally cautiously optimistic.
-Username17
So if 5e D&D is interesting, whether or not it is balanced or stable, that's great news. Fuck, I don't even really care that much if it's even playable past level 4, since any game that goes on longer than that can be thoroughly house ruled. But the first couple of levels need to be playable and interesting out of the box, because a very large chunk of my personal gaming is going to be exactly that.
4e is boring as fuck. I can't actually stand playing it out of the box. If they make 5e interesting, then I'll be happy. Monte has succeeded in that minimal design goal before, so I am personally cautiously optimistic.
-Username17