The New SRD/OGL. Also translations.

General questions, debates, and rants about RPGs

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
Lago PARANOIA
Invincible Overlord
Posts: 10555
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 3:00 am

The New SRD/OGL. Also translations.

Post by Lago PARANOIA »

This was such a brilliant idea that I have no idea why every game at least as mainstream as Mouseguard is not doing it. I personally find it extremely amazing that you can offer a SRD for free on the web and not only will people still buy your hardcover rulebooks but they'll also buy more than if you hadn't offered them at all.

Now that all said, one thing that really caught my interest is how Pathfinder's SRD is catching on with Japanese gamers. It seems as here it's actually (in a really, really small way) reducing sales. Not because of any cultural differences, mind you, but just because as far as I'm aware Pathfinder books are only in the English language.

I've been pushing heavily for the idea that D&D's next edition should definitely try to enter non-English markets, I'm just wondering how to go forward with this in conjunction with the SRD.
Last edited by Lago PARANOIA on Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
Josh Kablack wrote:Your freedom to make rulings up on the fly is in direct conflict with my freedom to interact with an internally consistent narrative. Your freedom to run/play a game without needing to understand a complex rule system is in direct conflict with my freedom to play a character whose abilities and flaws function as I intended within that ruleset. Your freedom to add and change rules in the middle of the game is in direct conflict with my ability to understand that rules system before I decided whether or not to join your game.

In short, your entire post is dismissive of not merely my intelligence, but my agency. And I don't mean agency as a player within one of your games, I mean my agency as a person. You do not want me to be informed when I make the fundamental decisions of deciding whether to join your game or buying your rules system.
User avatar
Dean
Duke
Posts: 2065
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 3:14 am

Post by Dean »

I am not aware on the data of SRD's effect on sales. But in the same post you say it improves sales, then briefly after that it is hurting sales. What's with that?
DSMatticus wrote:Fuck you, fuck you, fuck you, fuck you. I am filled with an unfathomable hatred.
Koumei
Serious Badass
Posts: 13977
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: South Ausfailia

Post by Koumei »

I think he means "Not releasing it in Japanese is hurting sales".

And the only Japanese Pathfinding I know of involves a Rouge of Harf Elf.
Count Arioch the 28th wrote:There is NOTHING better than lesbians. Lesbians make everything better.
Zinegata
Prince
Posts: 4071
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 7:33 am

Post by Zinegata »

SRDs are good because they let people get a look at the rules before they shell out money for the actual book.

They are also pretty bad for most RPG systems for this very reason, because if the rule set is awful the audience will run away after taking a look at the SRD.
Xur
Apprentice
Posts: 87
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 2:15 pm

Post by Xur »

Zinegata wrote:SRDs are good because they let people get a look at the rules before they shell out money for the actual book.

They are also pretty bad for most RPG systems for this very reason, because if the rule set is awful the audience will run away after taking a look at the SRD.
A lot of people are really bad at judging rulesets. And the majority of SRD-players I am aware of look just at the rules and stuff immediately needed, nothing more. Unless they have some degree of system mastery, they can't tell you anything about the rule set.

I agree with Largo. SRDs in foreign languages should help to spread out the game. Speaking for Germany, a lot of gamers here are middle-aged and grew up with early installments of DSA. A good part of these gamers doesn't know any english beside the universal modern age vocabulary, and the rights for the german-translated SRD remain with the publisher that originally sold the books here. As a result of this, used copies of german D&D 3E books are amazingly expensive. As in 60€ and more for a PHB, 120€ and more for SC.

This doesn't really help gathering new players at all if you're using non-english books.
User avatar
hogarth
Prince
Posts: 4582
Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 1:00 pm
Location: Toronto

Post by hogarth »

deanruel87 wrote:I am not aware on the data of SRD's effect on sales. But in the same post you say it improves sales, then briefly after that it is hurting sales. What's with that?
My understanding:

Sales of Pathfinder in Japan are pretty poor because the Pathfinder Core Rulebook is exorbitantly expensive compared to Japanese RPG rule books (it's imported, it's a glossy full-color hardcover instead of a less-glossy paperback, etc.) not to mention that it's in English. And yet people are still playing Pathfinder because they can using either the online PRD or a web site that some dude set up that translates it into Japanese.
Lago PARANOIA
Invincible Overlord
Posts: 10555
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 3:00 am

Post by Lago PARANOIA »

Zinegata wrote: They are also pretty bad for most RPG systems for this very reason, because if the rule set is awful the audience will run away after taking a look at the SRD.
Well, the other side of this coin is that a lot of awful games have been rescued by awesome fluff/artwork. An Urban Arcana SRD is almost worse than useless done classic-style, but an Urban Arcana SRD that had some of the genuinely cool things in it like the Sons of Tyranny or the mind flayer mafioso could draw in the fans.

The thing I'm worried about though is that even though giving free samples helps sells your product if its good, there comes a point where you have to worry about whether giving people a full-course sausage dinner sample satiates people too much to buy a sample.
Josh Kablack wrote:Your freedom to make rulings up on the fly is in direct conflict with my freedom to interact with an internally consistent narrative. Your freedom to run/play a game without needing to understand a complex rule system is in direct conflict with my freedom to play a character whose abilities and flaws function as I intended within that ruleset. Your freedom to add and change rules in the middle of the game is in direct conflict with my ability to understand that rules system before I decided whether or not to join your game.

In short, your entire post is dismissive of not merely my intelligence, but my agency. And I don't mean agency as a player within one of your games, I mean my agency as a person. You do not want me to be informed when I make the fundamental decisions of deciding whether to join your game or buying your rules system.
Post Reply