If abortion becomes illegal, what should be done with the women who have illegal abortions? Many people oppose abortion because they believe it is murder. They say that unborn babies are living beings with inalienable rights just like any other humans. If abortion is murder, what punishments should women who have illegal abortions face?
removed spam links. --Z
abortion
Moderator: Moderators
- Josh_Kablack
- King
- Posts: 5318
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
- Location: Online. duh
Tell ya what - post something that make you look less like a clever spambot and we can flame each other about it.
"But transportation issues are social-justice issues. The toll of bad transit policies and worse infrastructure—trains and buses that don’t run well and badly serve low-income neighborhoods, vehicular traffic that pollutes the environment and endangers the lives of cyclists and pedestrians—is borne disproportionately by black and brown communities."
-
- King
- Posts: 5271
- Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 5:32 am
No, different name. And it started by talking about how people who get abortions are really mean and horrible and it can't understand it, as though abortions personally hurt it. This one is basically asking the same question we constantly demanded tzor answer.
Count Arioch the 28th wrote:There is NOTHING better than lesbians. Lesbians make everything better.
-
- King
- Posts: 5271
- Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 5:32 am
Well, of course it has a different name. I just meant the text. It's so incredibly familiar that my first impression was that it had just ripped word for word straight out of the tzor conversations you're referring to. But that doesn't hold water, because there's a distinct lack of cursing and palpable hate. But yeah, that's probably why it feels familiar at all.
-
- Invincible Overlord
- Posts: 10555
- Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 3:00 am
Koumei wrote:No, different name. And it started by talking about how people who get abortions are really mean and horrible and it can't understand it, as though abortions personally hurt it. This one is basically asking the same question we constantly demanded tzor answer.
Personally, I think it's pretty sad that the spambots are becoming more compassionate and reasonable than the social conservatives.DSMatticus wrote:Well, of course it has a different name. I just meant the text. It's so incredibly familiar that my first impression was that it had just ripped word for word straight out of the tzor conversations you're referring to. But that doesn't hold water, because there's a distinct lack of cursing and palpable hate. But yeah, that's probably why it feels familiar at all.
Josh Kablack wrote:Your freedom to make rulings up on the fly is in direct conflict with my freedom to interact with an internally consistent narrative. Your freedom to run/play a game without needing to understand a complex rule system is in direct conflict with my freedom to play a character whose abilities and flaws function as I intended within that ruleset. Your freedom to add and change rules in the middle of the game is in direct conflict with my ability to understand that rules system before I decided whether or not to join your game.
In short, your entire post is dismissive of not merely my intelligence, but my agency. And I don't mean agency as a player within one of your games, I mean my agency as a person. You do not want me to be informed when I make the fundamental decisions of deciding whether to join your game or buying your rules system.