A Rough Sketch of Skill Feats

General questions, debates, and rants about RPGs

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
Judging__Eagle
Prince
Posts: 4671
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: Lake Ontario is in my backyard; Canada

Re: Rough Sketches of Skill Feats

Post by Judging__Eagle »

I don't know what hoppened.

You don't really need to hand out that ability if a wand can already do it.
The Gaming Den; where Mathematics are rigorously applied to Mythology.

While everyone's Philosophy is not in accord, that doesn't mean we're not on board.
User3
Prince
Posts: 3974
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Re: Rough Sketches of Skill Feats

Post by User3 »

Nystul's Magic Aura can only target objects, and even then it has a pretty restrictive weight limit (that 1st level wand can't even target the fighter's Greatsword). Being able to make people show up as non-magical is probably a good idea, although it could just as easily be a 2nd level spell.

Then, all we'd need is some way to make *illusions* (and other spells) not show up to Detect Magic, and we'd be in business, but that sounds more like a metamagic feat than anything else.
Catharz
Knight-Baron
Posts: 893
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: Rough Sketches of Skill Feats

Post by Catharz »

Judging__Eagle at [unixtime wrote:1179016143[/unixtime]]I don't know what hoppened.

You don't really need to hand out that ability if a wand can already do it.
My point is that not everybody with maxed ranks in disguise will have maxed ranks in UMD.
Guest (Unregistered) at [unixtime wrote:1179028539[/unixtime]]
Then, all we'd need is some way to make *illusions* (and other spells) not show up to Detect Magic, and we'd be in business, but that sounds more like a metamagic feat than anything else.

Heh, you don't want illusions to seem non-magical. That would be too suspicious.

You want them to detect as magic, but not specifically as illusions. Unless you're dealing in shadow, of course.
User3
Prince
Posts: 3974
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Re: Rough Sketches of Skill Feats

Post by User3 »

I'd love for the illusionary floor over the pit trap to detect as non-magical, since the rest of the corridor sure as hell does. Likewise for being invisible. If I don't want to put up the "pay attention to THIS" flag, there should be an option to avoid it.
Catharz
Knight-Baron
Posts: 893
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: Rough Sketches of Skill Feats

Post by Catharz »

Guest (Unregistered) at [unixtime wrote:1179036061[/unixtime]]I'd love for the illusionary floor over the pit trap to detect as non-magical, since the rest of the corridor sure as hell does. Likewise for being invisible. If I don't want to put up the "pay attention to THIS" flag, there should be an option to avoid it.
True 'nuff.
CalibronXXX
Knight-Baron
Posts: 698
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: Rough Sketches of Skill Feats

Post by CalibronXXX »

Catharz at [unixtime wrote:1179034261[/unixtime]]My point is that not everybody with maxed ranks in disguise will have maxed ranks in UMD.

It's a first level spell, you can get it for free as an at-will use activated item in the Wish economy; at caster level 7 even; caster level 8 as a command word item.
Catharz
Knight-Baron
Posts: 893
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: Rough Sketches of Skill Feats

Post by Catharz »

Calibron at [unixtime wrote:1179069237[/unixtime]]
Catharz at [unixtime wrote:1179034261[/unixtime]]My point is that not everybody with maxed ranks in disguise will have maxed ranks in UMD.

It's a first level spell, you can get it for free as an at-will use activated item in the Wish economy; at caster level 7 even; caster level 8 as a command word item.

And then you get hit by a dispel trap of moderately high caster level and everyone knows you're a pit fiend wielding the Sword of Kas.
CalibronXXX
Knight-Baron
Posts: 698
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: Rough Sketches of Skill Feats

Post by CalibronXXX »

And you don't care because you're a Pit Fiend Wielding the Sword of Kas!

Not saying a skill feat shouldn't allow you to hide your magic auras; just pointing out that there are cheap alternatives.

Besides, you can get a whole bunch of once a day CL 20 Nystul's Magic Aura bling if you're so worried about dispel traps or similar.
Iaimeki
Journeyman
Posts: 159
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: Rough Sketches of Skill Feats

Post by Iaimeki »

Catharz at [unixtime wrote:1179015565[/unixtime]]
Judging__Eagle at [unixtime wrote:1179014672[/unixtime]]
Actually; (Nystul's) Magic Aura is a wandable spell (1st lvl) that hides all magic on a character for a day/level.

Most people don't do so, but spending 750 GP everytime you want to hide your magical gear's magical auras isn't too big of a deal for someone that actually wants to hide their gear's auras.
Huh, just the sort of thing you'd want Disguise to do. Maybe I'll make a skill feat with that as one of the abilities.


Actually, my skill feat for Disguise already does that. It also scales so that you can use it on objects that are bigger than 5 lbs.

Calibron at [unixtime wrote:1179069237[/unixtime]]
Catharz at [unixtime wrote:1179034261[/unixtime]]My point is that not everybody with maxed ranks in disguise will have maxed ranks in UMD.

It's a first level spell, you can get it for free as an at-will use activated item in the Wish economy; at caster level 7 even; caster level 8 as a command word item.


I think it's pretty clear at this point that without significant revisions to the magic item system, the wish economy breaks.

I'm not sure what hiding the auras of actual spells should be. It's something I've considered, but for the Skill feats, I tried to avoid things that would be mostly of use to spellcasters unless the skill was one only spellcasters usually have, i.e., Concentration or Spellcraft.
CalibronXXX
Knight-Baron
Posts: 698
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: Rough Sketches of Skill Feats

Post by CalibronXXX »

Iaimeki at [unixtime wrote:1179526565[/unixtime]]
I think it's pretty clear at this point that without significant revisions to the magic item system, the wish economy breaks.

I don't necessarily disagree, but in this case I see nothing broken about infinite first level spells by level 11, even at Caster level 20.
PhoneLobster
King
Posts: 6403
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: Rough Sketches of Skill Feats

Post by PhoneLobster »

I don't think the point of the wish economy is that it doesn't break.

I'm pretty certain that the whole point is that its just a realization and admission of the fact that the system as it stands essentially creates limitless wealth for characters at some point. And that without even more than just a revision of magical items thats the way it will stay.

Its basically just a starting point, of course it requires some sort of revision of magic items. But that was required ANYWAY and without some understanding or determination of what limitless wealth is and what that means that revision would fail.
Phonelobster's Self Proclaimed Greatest Hits Collection : (no really, they are awesome)
CalibronXXX
Knight-Baron
Posts: 698
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: Rough Sketches of Skill Feats

Post by CalibronXXX »

Fortunately that limitless wealth isn't actually worth much at all under the Tome series rules. Using said revised rules, magic items only need a revision due to the fact that magic items need a revision, irregardless of the "infinite" wealth created by the wish economy.

However, as was pointed out in the "More Wish Economy" thread the wish economy as written allows for infinite 9th level scrolls, and as we all know 9th level spells make the game utterly unplayable, but as was also pointed out in the aforementioned thread limiting magic items created by XP-free Wishes to once-per-day or more items fixes this almost completely; leaving only abberations in the system, such as the Candle of Invocation, which can then be safely, and sanely, disposed of on an individual basis.
AlphaNerd
Master
Posts: 206
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: Rough Sketches of Skill Feats

Post by AlphaNerd »

Hide

As mentioned in the Dungeonomicon, Hide should not require cover or concealment to function.

That's great, but does neither cover nor concealment give you any bonuses then? It seems like being half hidden should give some sort of circumstance bonus.
Iaimeki
Journeyman
Posts: 159
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: Rough Sketches of Skill Feats

Post by Iaimeki »

AlphaNerd at [unixtime wrote:1179689262[/unixtime]]
Hide

As mentioned in the Dungeonomicon, Hide should not require cover or concealment to function.

That's great, but does neither cover nor concealment give you any bonuses then? It seems like being half hidden should give some sort of circumstance bonus.


It didn't give you any explicit bonuses in 3.0, so I decided not to add any here. The DM, as always, may exercise discretion.
User avatar
Crissa
King
Posts: 6720
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: Santa Cruz

Re: Rough Sketches of Skill Feats

Post by Crissa »

Cover and concealment should come from Hide, not vice versa.

Circumstance is more for the opponent than for you - since they get minuses to their spot for distance; cover and concealment should give them minuses as well to types of search checks.

Put the numbers on one side of the equation, not on both sides.

-Crissa
User avatar
Crissa
King
Posts: 6720
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: Santa Cruz

Re: Rough Sketches of Skill Feats

Post by Crissa »

Did we ever come up with a simplified skill feat system instead of a point based one?

Less numbers on the sheet I am all for.

-Crissa
User avatar
erik
King
Posts: 5868
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: Rough Sketches of Skill Feats

Post by erik »

On the Animal Affinity feat, the top tier ability is a bit silly on multiple fronts. Too many dice, and no such thing as CR 14 animals.

CR=Level -2 on an ability gained at level 16 is a little silly since there are no animals with a CR in the double digits unless you rummage through non-core books.

Dire Tigers, Rocs, Tyrannosaurs and Giant Squids top out at CR 8 or 9.

CR, number appearing:
Level - 2, d2
Level - 3, d3
Level - 4, d4
Level - 5, d6
Level - 6, d8
Level - 7, 2d6
Level - 8, 2d10
Level - 9, 3d10
Level - 10, 7d6
Level - 11, 3d20
Level - 12, 7d12
Level - 13, d100
Level - 14, 6d20
Level - 15, 25d6
Level - 16, 10d20
Level - 17, 40d6
Level - 18, 60d6
Level - 19, 80d6


If you've already introduced a d100, then it's just cruel to make someone revert to using a d6 for the higher rolls. Rolling and summing 80 dice for 1 standard action is a good way to kill 5 minutes I suppose.

If this is intended as a combat ability then it should probably cap out at 6 critters and go no higher. Controlling and keeping tabs on more than that starts to become a huge time sink. Not to mention that using critters that are 10 or more under CR in battles is annoying.

I'd recommend getting rid of all of the die rolls and simply make the number of animals summoned a non-random, direct function of either your skill check or rank. Not only that, but I'd scale back that CR table.

So how about since the ability comes so late in levels anyway, simply have a set table for what you can summon and not modify it over the next 5 levels?

1 CR 11 critter
2 CR 10 critters
3 CR 9 critters
4 CR 8 critters
6 CR 7 critters
8 CR 6 critters
10 CR 5 critters
20 CR 4 critters
40 CR 3 critters
100 CR 2 critters
200 CR 1 critters
300 CR <1 critters

The CR 11 and 10 critters are mostly place-holders for dire elephants and such, should they be included in a campaign,

The low CR critters are included for fluffness sake... like granting temporary steeds to the villagers escaping the giant hordes, anyone using 40 deinonychuses in combat should be shot.

For the "realists" critters may only be summonable in their native habitats... or 1/2 the normal amount when outside of those terrains.
User avatar
Crissa
King
Posts: 6720
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: Santa Cruz

Re: Rough Sketches of Skill Feats

Post by Crissa »

Perhaps it should switch to swarms, instead.

Or go away. Going away is an option for skills, too. We don't need all of them, do we?

-Crissa
Iaimeki
Journeyman
Posts: 159
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: Rough Sketches of Skill Feats

Post by Iaimeki »

clikml at [unixtime wrote:1184679564[/unixtime]]On the Animal Affinity feat, the top tier ability is a bit silly on multiple fronts. Too many dice, and no such thing as CR 14 animals.

CR=Level -2 on an ability gained at level 16 is a little silly since there are no animals with a CR in the double digits unless you rummage through non-core books.

Dire Tigers, Rocs, Tyrannosaurs and Giant Squids top out at CR 8 or 9.


Yes, but I didn't know what to do here: things of CR more than a few levels below a character's level are useless by design. Maybe open it up to magical beasts or something?

clikml at [unixtime wrote:1184679564[/unixtime]]
CR, number appearing:
Level - 2, d2
Level - 3, d3
Level - 4, d4
Level - 5, d6
Level - 6, d8
Level - 7, 2d6
Level - 8, 2d10
Level - 9, 3d10
Level - 10, 7d6
Level - 11, 3d20
Level - 12, 7d12
Level - 13, d100
Level - 14, 6d20
Level - 15, 25d6
Level - 16, 10d20
Level - 17, 40d6
Level - 18, 60d6
Level - 19, 80d6


If you've already introduced a d100, then it's just cruel to make someone revert to using a d6 for the higher rolls. Rolling and summing 80 dice for 1 standard action is a good way to kill 5 minutes I suppose.

If this is intended as a combat ability then it should probably cap out at 6 critters and go no higher. Controlling and keeping tabs on more than that starts to become a huge time sink. Not to mention that using critters that are 10 or more under CR in battles is annoying.

I'd recommend getting rid of all of the die rolls and simply make the number of animals summoned a non-random, direct function of either your skill check or rank. Not only that, but I'd scale back that CR table.

So how about since the ability comes so late in levels anyway, simply have a set table for what you can summon and not modify it over the next 5 levels?

1 CR 11 critter
2 CR 10 critters
3 CR 9 critters
4 CR 8 critters
6 CR 7 critters
8 CR 6 critters
10 CR 5 critters
20 CR 4 critters
40 CR 3 critters
100 CR 2 critters
200 CR 1 critters
300 CR <1 critters

The CR 11 and 10 critters are mostly place-holders for dire elephants and such, should they be included in a campaign,

The low CR critters are included for fluffness sake... like granting temporary steeds to the villagers escaping the giant hordes, anyone using 40 deinonychuses in combat should be shot.


I borrowed the table straight from the Tome of Fiends, since i didn't have any other handy guidelines on how many creatures one should get from the ability. Your criticisms about the dice are on target, though: past the top levels, there's no real need for randomness at all (the relative variance gets damped).

I don't like fixing the table at 16th level: while the game is horribly broken that high, I dislike the aesthetic of an ability that caps out, leaving no more reason to raise the skill. It's something I tried to avoid for all the skill feats.

Large hordes of low-CR creatures are, of course, not supposed to be useful in combat, but can be handy as story elements. There's no real check on someone *trying* to use them in combat, other than the other people in the game saying, "Please don't bog things down," and horde-clearing spells like cloudkill and blasphemy.

clikml at [unixtime wrote:1184679564[/unixtime]]For the "realists" critters may only be summonable in their native habitats... or 1/2 the normal amount when outside of those terrains.


"Realists" can go to hell. They're the reason only wizards, clerics, and druids get nice things in the core.

I reduced the dice-rolling required in the chart, but in the vein of monsters' summon ability I didn't want it to be completely reliable. Thanks for the criticism!
Fwib
Knight-Baron
Posts: 755
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: Rough Sketches of Skill Feats

Post by Fwib »

Crissa at [unixtime wrote:1184717108[/unixtime]]Perhaps it should switch to swarms, instead.
What about the 'Mob' template from DMG2?
CalibronXXX
Knight-Baron
Posts: 698
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: A Rough Sketch of Skill Feats

Post by CalibronXXX »

Extraordinary Leaper*[Skill]

You spend more time with your feet off the ground than on it, when you want to. (This is a Skill feat that scales with your ranks in Jump.)

Benefit: The DCs for high jumps for you are only 2 times the height instead of 4. In addition you can hop up (see the Jump skill description) a number of feet equal to or less then your ranks in jump.

4: You can jump as a swift action.

9: By using an appropriate action(normally a move action) you can make an additional jump at any point during another jump.

14: The distance of your jumps in a round is no longer constrained by your land speed. If your jump check exceeds your land speed you may complete it in the same round using only the action used to initiate the jump.

19: The DCs for jump checks for you are cut in half.**


Combat Jumping*[Combat]

You use your powerful leaps to great effect in a fight. (This is a Combat feat that scales with your Base Attack Bonus.)

Benefit: You get a +3 bonus on jump checks, also, whenever you engage a land or sea bound opponent, or one who is flying with less than Good maneuverability, while you are jumping you are considered to have the Edge against them.

1: Whenever you jump you can throw yourself at a creature and make a touch attack, if you succeed you may initiate a Bull Rush and use your jump check in place of a strength check.

6: When moving out of an enemy’s threatened area(or moving into it in the case of high level enemies with Horde Breaker) via jumping you no longer trigger an attack of opportunity. Whenever you make a melee as a standard action or as part of a full attack you can hop five feet in any direction.

11: Whenever you would be allowed an attack of opportunity you can instead jump.

16: You can jump as an immediate action.

*I suck at names; suggestions welcome.
**Looking for a better 19 rank ability, this one seems too bland and maybe too powerful.

I tried to avoid overlap between Leap of the Heavens and my Extraordinary Leaper.

If you want to add these to the big list on the first post feel free to do so. Don't worry one way or another about giving me credit for them; if you feel like it, go ahead, if you can't be bothered, then don't sweat it.
CalibronXXX
Knight-Baron
Posts: 698
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: A Rough Sketch of Skill Feats

Post by CalibronXXX »

No feedback? You know I thrive on feedback. Or is it that they're just perfect as is?
User avatar
Judging__Eagle
Prince
Posts: 4671
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: Lake Ontario is in my backyard; Canada

Re: A Rough Sketch of Skill Feats

Post by Judging__Eagle »

No, they're hard to name, I tried a couple weeks ago and drew a blank.
The Gaming Den; where Mathematics are rigorously applied to Mythology.

While everyone's Philosophy is not in accord, that doesn't mean we're not on board.
User avatar
JonSetanta
King
Posts: 5525
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: interbutts

Re: A Rough Sketch of Skill Feats

Post by JonSetanta »

In retrospect, they're perfect, Calibron. Wish I had checked back on this earlier, but until Yahzi had linked here (cuz the PDF lacks this thread) I had forgotten about it!
My favs are Alertness, Swim Like a Fish, and your version of the Jump skill (combine with Iameki's though, what happens? yikes)
The Adventurer's Almanac wrote:
Fri Oct 01, 2021 10:25 pm
Nobody gives a flying fuck about Tordek and Regdar.
Surgo
Duke
Posts: 1924
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: A Rough Sketch of Skill Feats

Post by Surgo »

The problem is that even with them, the jump skill still sucks.

A good feat based around Jump needs to address the problem that the skill stops being useful when everyone starts flying.
Post Reply