I don't think that trying to change the politically correct titles for the developmentally handicapped, blacks, gays, women, ect, is not perfectly valid.deanruel87 wrote:I genuinely think that trying to fight a battle against aggression and insult through the use of changing the politically correct titles for the retarded and whatnot.
I think that doing so is completely different from arguing that words should not be used for derogatory meanings that have nothing to do with those people.
Bitch has a meaning that may not be gendered, and I am on the fence about its use. [EDITED] obviously has no non racial use, so it is straight out. My anecdotal experience with developmentally handicapped people indicates that they do not actually care about the use of the word retarded to described people who are fucking stupid, and retarded pretty obviously has a meaning, derogatory though it is, independent of those people, but I am open to changing my opinion based on more evidence. I'm leaning against [EDITED] on the same principles of which I am on the fence about bitch, but there seems to be some genuine argument about it.
But in absolutely none of those cases, do I object to changing the way we are "allowed" to refer to people from retarded to developmentally handicapped (or from retarded to mentally challenged to developmentally handicapped), from [EDITED] to black (or African-American where appropriate and preferred), or from bitch to woman. (Obviously that last one is weird, but seriously, there are people who think bitch is an appropriate thing to call all women, just in general, not when insulting them specifically for qualities which are "bitchy." As for calling them bitchy, see above.)