Video Games
Moderator: Moderators
- RedstoneOrc
- Apprentice
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 3:10 am
- Location: The Continental USA
Just to let everyone know you need to play Banner Saga before the new one comes out. Played this game twice in two days and everyone needs to get this pretty gem.
The gameplay isn't that complex or amazing, but the entire game is hand draw (tablet-draw?) and the score is so great for a indie game. Banner saga just has jaw-dropping dressing around the solid game. You have a few choices and story paths to choose from, better than most big triple A companies do now a days. Still surprised about how many languages the game comes in too.
The gameplay isn't that complex or amazing, but the entire game is hand draw (tablet-draw?) and the score is so great for a indie game. Banner saga just has jaw-dropping dressing around the solid game. You have a few choices and story paths to choose from, better than most big triple A companies do now a days. Still surprised about how many languages the game comes in too.
I have currently hit the ignore feature 5 times on accident, and only once on purpose. This has got to be some kind of record.
This game has shitty gameplay, but it's pretty and makes pretty sounds. So you have to play it. Or you could watch a movie, instead of being an idiot.
The U.S. isn't a democracy and if you think it is, you are a rube.DSMatticus wrote:Kaelik gonna kaelik. Whatcha gonna do?
That's libertarians for you - anarchists who want police protection from their slaves.
- RedstoneOrc
- Apprentice
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 3:10 am
- Location: The Continental USA
Not shitty cock sucker, its' gameplay just isn't the main draw of the title. Like you know, about every jrpg, rogue-like, or any other game genre that focuses on story more than gameplay.Kaelik wrote:This game has shitty gameplay, but it's pretty and makes pretty sounds. So you have to play it. Or you could watch a movie, instead of being an idiot.
Last edited by RedstoneOrc on Sat Apr 09, 2016 1:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
Uh... no. Like, maybe shitty JRPGs, but gameplay is pretty much the main draw of all rogue likes, also good RPGs, also good games.RedstoneOrc wrote:Not shitty cock sucker, its' gameplay just isn't the main draw of the title. Like you know, about every jrpg, rogue-like, or any other game genre that focuses on story more than gameplay.Kaelik wrote:This game has shitty gameplay, but it's pretty and makes pretty sounds. So you have to play it. Or you could watch a movie, instead of being an idiot.
The U.S. isn't a democracy and if you think it is, you are a rube.DSMatticus wrote:Kaelik gonna kaelik. Whatcha gonna do?
That's libertarians for you - anarchists who want police protection from their slaves.
-
- King
- Posts: 5271
- Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 5:32 am
-
- Knight-Baron
- Posts: 701
- Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 11:03 am
The PSP re-release (War of the Lions) redid the translation and made it more coherent (while adding more shitty Olde English in the place of formal Japanese). It didn't make it any less insane, though.DSMatticus wrote:I found Final Fantasy Tactic's gameplay a lot more enjoyable than Banner Saga's. The story was also pretty good. Sort of. Probably. Maybe that's just my nostalgia. It's a Final Fantasy, okay? Shit's convoluted at best and trippy at worst, but my younger self liked it.
Banner Saga is an SRPG with changes to the formula that are, as far as I can tell, different for the sake of being different. They're not any better than other SRPGs, and they're not necessarily worse. What it doesn't do is enhance the core gameplay mechanic, which is what you want when you change the formula. For instance, going down the line here:
The core gameplay mechanic is best represented by Final Fantasy Tactics or Shining Force. Turn-based, grid movement, and a discrete set of options you can utilize once per turn.
An alteration that enhances the gameplay mechanic is Valkyria Chronicles. Not only do you have to manage your standard, move, attack, item, etc., characters, but you also have a fairly decent cover system to interact with the typical combat (guns), AND you also get to manage tanks which have a wildly different movement and attack ability, while also trying to take down enemy tanks. It's different, and the mechanics are interesting enough to keep people playing.
An alteration that doesn't enhance the gameplay mechanic and is different for the sake of being different is, in my eyes, Fire Emblem and the Weapon Triangle. It's just one more parameter you have to watch when attacking in a genre that's already more or less defined by the numbers. It's a boring additional step.
Where does Banner Saga fall here? The third, because it's just a boring numbers shift, with options to interact with the new number. That doesn't make it exciting, it just makes it a boring numbers shift with new discrete options to interact with the new number.
I would call it a passable SRPG, because that's exactly what it is. The only thing that makes it stand out is its story and aesthetic, and that's enough for some people.
Regarding FFT:
Why did people give the game shit for the line, "Blame yourself or God" it made perfect sense to me?
Also regarding War of Lions:
It was annoying that everyone even low class people were speaking the same level of sophisticated "olde english". Also Argath's line to the thieves:
Why did people give the game shit for the line, "Blame yourself or God" it made perfect sense to me?
Also regarding War of Lions:
It was annoying that everyone even low class people were speaking the same level of sophisticated "olde english". Also Argath's line to the thieves:
savage as fuck.You, no less human than we? Ha! Now there's a beastly thought. You've
been less than we from the moment your baseborn father fell upon your mother in
whatever gutter saw you sired! You've been chattel since you came into the
world drenched in common blood!
Last edited by Leress on Sat Apr 09, 2016 4:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
Koumei wrote:I'm just glad that Jill Stein stayed true to her homeopathic principles by trying to win with .2% of the vote. She just hasn't diluted it enough!
Koumei wrote:I am disappointed in Santorum: he should carry his dead election campaign to term!
Just a heads up... Your post is pregnant... When you miss that many periods it's just a given.
]I want him to tongue-punch my box.
The divine in me says the divine in you should go fuck itself.
Middle English was still rather ponderous compared to the modern language, but it's also a thing where characters in plays (of all forms) are much better at speaking than real people are.
Plus, it's difficult to be properly rude and dismissive of people and still be PG 13 or whatever. And there's the weird thing where their serious curses are comedy lines to us, and our serious curses where just their normal words for everyday stuff. It wasn't until that whole puritan thing caught on that we did away with the words for sexual activity from normal speech.
Plus, it's difficult to be properly rude and dismissive of people and still be PG 13 or whatever. And there's the weird thing where their serious curses are comedy lines to us, and our serious curses where just their normal words for everyday stuff. It wasn't until that whole puritan thing caught on that we did away with the words for sexual activity from normal speech.
PC, SJW, anti-fascist, not being a dick, or working on it, he/him.
-
- Prince
- Posts: 3698
- Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 3:55 pm
I played Banner Saga, what I remember was the Oregon Trail minigame between turn-based strategy missions. Still not preordering 2 on principle. Because fuck preorders.
Kaelik wrote:Because powerful men get away with terrible shit, and even the public domain ones get ignored, and then, when the floodgates open, it turns out there was a goddam flood behind it.
Zak S, Zak Smith, Dndwithpornstars, Zak Sabbath, Justin Bieber, shitmuffin
-
- Knight-Baron
- Posts: 701
- Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 11:03 am
I think people gave it shit because until that point (in the original translation) none of the characters seemed quite so nihilistic to bust out a line like that. Either that or they thought it was awkward in the context.Leress wrote:Regarding FFT:
Why did people give the game shit for the line, "Blame yourself or God" it made perfect sense to me?
- OgreBattle
- King
- Posts: 6820
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 9:33 am
That was one of the most memorable lines of the game, turned into a meme among my friends before we even knew what memes were.Leress wrote: Why did people give the game shit for the line, "Blame yourself or God" it made perfect sense to me?
The scene preceding that is Delita watching his little sister die isn't it? Delita has also just kidnapped a girl that was praying in a church.none of the characters seemed quite so nihilistic to bust out a line like that
Argath was a memorable character.
Last edited by OgreBattle on Sat Apr 09, 2016 8:09 am, edited 4 times in total.
-
- King
- Posts: 5271
- Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 5:32 am
Chronologically it would be a couple years after witnessing his sister's death, but the line itself is delivered during the tutorial prologue at the start of the game. I would call that a mistake - you're not going to be able to really appreciate what the line says about post-timeskip Delita on your first playthrough. But yeah, it's a great line, and the new translation's crack at it is much less poignant.
The FE weapon triangle already was a thing before the first final fantasy ever was dreamt of. FE did not do it for the sake of difference, it did it for being pretty much the first tactical rpg.Relentllessimp wrote:An alteration that doesn't enhance the gameplay mechanic and is different for the sake of being different is, in my eyes, Fire Emblem and the Weapon Triangle. It's just one more parameter you have to watch when attacking in a genre that's already more or less defined by the numbers. It's a boring additional step.
And it does add a key strategic layer, since the weapon you attack with is he weapon you willb be stuck with the rest of the round. So using a sword leaves you more vulnerable to spear enemies.
Meanwhile FFT has craploads of boring numbers maintenance with armor and acessories and fuck that noise. In FE each unit has only one weapon equipped at a time for passive gear and that is it, allowing you to focus on tactics instead of playing a glorified mass Christmas tree simulator.
Last edited by maglag on Sat Apr 09, 2016 2:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
FrankTrollman wrote: Actually, our blood banking system is set up exactly the way you'd want it to be if you were a secret vampire conspiracy.
No, it was not. It was introduced in FE 4: Genealogy of the Holy War for the Super Famicom.maglag wrote: The FE weapon triangle already was a thing before the first final fantasy ever was dreamt of. FE did not do it for the sake of difference, it did it for being pretty much the first tactical rpg.
Koumei wrote:I'm just glad that Jill Stein stayed true to her homeopathic principles by trying to win with .2% of the vote. She just hasn't diluted it enough!
Koumei wrote:I am disappointed in Santorum: he should carry his dead election campaign to term!
Just a heads up... Your post is pregnant... When you miss that many periods it's just a given.
]I want him to tongue-punch my box.
The divine in me says the divine in you should go fuck itself.
- Whipstitch
- Prince
- Posts: 3660
- Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2011 10:23 pm
The weapon triangle isn't a disaster or anything but I feel like overall it hurt more games than it definitively helped. For example, Path of Radiance was easy mode even as a newbie to the series because the game gave you a steady drip of good cavaliers, a well-rounded class that would eventually move onto using 2 weapon types in a game where most units only end up using 1 type. It let you run around with axes all day and still have something your back pocket when a sword wielding dodge tank showed up.
bears fall, everyone dies
-
- Knight-Baron
- Posts: 701
- Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 11:03 am
I'm sorry, maglag, I try to give you the benefit of the doubt but this is just wrong. The Weapon Triangle just means "Attack this enemy with this unit, this enemy with this unit, and this enemy with this unit". It's just one boring additional step to the numbers you're already keeping an eye on - like HP, Attack, Defense, and Skills.maglag wrote:And it does add a key strategic layer, since the weapon you attack with is he weapon you willb be stuck with the rest of the round. So using a sword leaves you more vulnerable to spear enemies.
And I already said that FFT is an example of the baseline. Bitching about it being boring, gameplay-wise, doesn't really add anything. I could just as easily say that the Job system adds a layer of strategic depth, like using a Black Mage throwing Ice spells at Bombs and Fire spells at goblins or using a Summoner to tear up the entire battlefield or breaking the game with a Calculator. It'd be lying, just like you with the weapon triangle.maglag wrote:Meanwhile FFT has craploads of boring numbers maintenance with armor and acessories and fuck that noise. In FE each unit has only one weapon equipped at a time for passive gear and that is it, allowing you to focus on tactics instead of playing a glorified mass Christmas tree simulator.
It looked interesting. What's the selling points on gameplay?K wrote:Hyper Light Drifter is amazeballs.
He jumps like a damned dragoon, and charges into battle fighting rather insane monsters with little more than his bare hands and rather nasty spell effects conjured up solely through knowledge and the local plantlife. He unerringly knows where his goal lies, he breathes underwater and is untroubled by space travel, seems to have no limits to his actual endurance and favors killing his enemies by driving both boots square into their skull. His agility is unmatched, and his strength legendary, able to fling about a turtle shell big enough to contain a man with enough force to barrel down a near endless path of unfortunates.
--The horror of Mario
Zak S, Zak Smith, Dndwithpornstars, Zak Sabbath. He is a terrible person and a hack at writing and art. His cultural contributions are less than Justin Bieber's, and he's a shitmuffin. Go go gadget Googlebomb!
--The horror of Mario
Zak S, Zak Smith, Dndwithpornstars, Zak Sabbath. He is a terrible person and a hack at writing and art. His cultural contributions are less than Justin Bieber's, and he's a shitmuffin. Go go gadget Googlebomb!
Old Top Down Zelda meets Dark Souls Combat, but with the platforming challenges of more modern Zelda crammed into a 2d game.Maxus wrote:It looked interesting. What's the selling points on gameplay?K wrote:Hyper Light Drifter is amazeballs.
The U.S. isn't a democracy and if you think it is, you are a rube.DSMatticus wrote:Kaelik gonna kaelik. Whatcha gonna do?
That's libertarians for you - anarchists who want police protection from their slaves.
Maglag is objectively correct about the mechanical behavior.RelentlessImp wrote:I'm sorry, maglag, I try to give you the benefit of the doubt but this is just wrong. The Weapon Triangle just means "Attack this enemy with this unit, this enemy with this unit, and this enemy with this unit". It's just one boring additional step to the numbers you're already keeping an eye on - like HP, Attack, Defense, and Skills.maglag wrote:And it does add a key strategic layer, since the weapon you attack with is he weapon you willb be stuck with the rest of the round. So using a sword leaves you more vulnerable to spear enemies.
Using a sword to attack means you are more vulnerable to being attacked by spear enemies unless you manage to unequip the sword, which is possible but logistically complicated. So there are circumstances when players will deliberately avoid using a weapon triangle advantage when attacking so they aren't vulnerable to other enemies in the area.
DSMatticus wrote:It's not just that everything you say is stupid, but that they are Gordian knots of stupid that leave me completely bewildered as to where to even begin. After hearing you speak Alexander the Great would stab you and triumphantly declare the puzzle solved.
-
- Knight-Baron
- Posts: 701
- Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 11:03 am
And how, precisely, is this different from keeping a squishy SRPG character, say a mage, away from the physical powerhouses, while making certain that you don't clump up your characters to avoid taking it up the ass from area of effect attacks? It's still baseline gameplay decisions.name_here wrote:Using a sword to attack means you are more vulnerable to being attacked by spear enemies unless you manage to unequip the sword, which is possible but logistically complicated. So there are circumstances when players will deliberately avoid using a weapon triangle advantage when attacking so they aren't vulnerable to other enemies in the area.
First of all, the game is absolutely gorgeous. Other than that, it's a metroidvania top-down action 'platformer' with Dark Souls-esque way of giving narrative. No one speaks, occasional furries just show you pictures of their important life events and it's up to you to guess what any of that means.Maxus wrote:It looked interesting. What's the selling points on gameplay?K wrote:Hyper Light Drifter is amazeballs.
Well, yes ultimately it does end up manifesting as deciding who to move where and who to attack and what weapons to do that with. It is an SRPG and that is the entire game, and Valkyria Chronicles reduces to that with a bit of twitch reflexes courtesy of interception fire. You position your soldiers where they can't be easily shot, you shoot anti-infantry weapons at infantry and anti-tank weapons at tanks unless you can get a particularly kickass gun in position to shoot their radiator.RelentlessImp wrote:And how, precisely, is this different from keeping a squishy SRPG character, say a mage, away from the physical powerhouses, while making certain that you don't clump up your characters to avoid taking it up the ass from area of effect attacks? It's still baseline gameplay decisions.name_here wrote:Using a sword to attack means you are more vulnerable to being attacked by spear enemies unless you manage to unequip the sword, which is possible but logistically complicated. So there are circumstances when players will deliberately avoid using a weapon triangle advantage when attacking so they aren't vulnerable to other enemies in the area.
But it's different because you watch the weapon triangle in addition to keeping your mages away from physical powerhouses and in some maps avoiding clumping up. So there's more to your baseline gameplay decisions than if the weapon triangle didn't exist. It creates scenarios where people might use a weapon that is numerically inferior to another weapon It means having access to two weapon types is more valuable than having access to one of them. It allows for additional alterations like Reaver weapons. It provides an incentive for luring enemies into using a specific weapon so they're vulnerable on the next turn.
Yes, it's another thing to keep track of, but fucking everything is another thing to keep track of. The SRPG genre is about keeping track of a ton of things that influence who moves where and who they attack. The weapon triangle adds an additional factor that does not always reduce to just using whoever has a triangle advantage. It's a very simple mechanic, the GUI helpfully highlights it for you, and it interacts with other mechanics to produce far-reaching implications like ever using axes; they hit hard but without triangle advantage they just aren't accurate enough. But with the triangle:
Paladins are always prized for their flexibility and PoR's crop was notably badass, and axes are valuable against the lancers that tend to make up the bulk of the enemy forces. Still, I honestly prefer focusing on lances because of their superior base stat profile, while I like swords even better but they often leave you down-triangle. Also, before PoR axes were honestly pretty shit even with the triangle, courtesy of cripplingly high weight. There's a reason the series has ditched the weight mechanic and expanded the triangle.Whipstitch wrote:For example, Path of Radiance was easy mode even as a newbie to the series because the game gave you a steady drip of good cavaliers, a well-rounded class that would eventually move onto using 2 weapon types in a game where most units only end up using 1 type. It let you run around with axes all day and still have something your back pocket when a sword wielding dodge tank showed up.
Weapons had a weight stat, which tended to be higher for better weapons and within a tier went sword<lance<axe. Pre-PoR, units had a Build stat, and effectively subtracted (weight-build) from their speed in a fight. Speed is really fucking important and tended to be even more important for units with low build. It was supposed to make people not just use the highest-tier weapon all the time, but it had a nasty habit of rendering Pegasus Knights and axe dudes borderline useless because they couldn't eat the penalty from the weapons they needed to keep up on damage output. PoR redid this to use (weight-strength) and the numbers work out to it basically being a non-issue for physical combatants.
Fates has replaced it with a system that actually works, where pretty much every weapon comes with a drawback and it's best to keep a mix on all your dudes so you can pick an appropriate one for a given situation. I'm a bit ambivalent about the silver weapon penalty; it gives a stacking -2 strength penalty after a fight that goes away at a rate of 1 per turn, which is absolutely crippling in a sustained fight. Relegates them to being can openers.
Fates has replaced it with a system that actually works, where pretty much every weapon comes with a drawback and it's best to keep a mix on all your dudes so you can pick an appropriate one for a given situation. I'm a bit ambivalent about the silver weapon penalty; it gives a stacking -2 strength penalty after a fight that goes away at a rate of 1 per turn, which is absolutely crippling in a sustained fight. Relegates them to being can openers.
Last edited by name_here on Sun Apr 10, 2016 5:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
DSMatticus wrote:It's not just that everything you say is stupid, but that they are Gordian knots of stupid that leave me completely bewildered as to where to even begin. After hearing you speak Alexander the Great would stab you and triumphantly declare the puzzle solved.
It's moody and evocative and beautiful.Longes wrote:First of all, the game is absolutely gorgeous. Other than that, it's a metroidvania top-down action 'platformer' with Dark Souls-esque way of giving narrative. No one speaks, occasional furries just show you pictures of their important life events and it's up to you to guess what any of that means.Maxus wrote:It looked interesting. What's the selling points on gameplay?K wrote:Hyper Light Drifter is amazeballs.
Tough as shit sometimes, but I'm actually staying away from help forums because the figuring out is so charged.