Quotes 2017
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Duke
- Posts: 1060
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 3:51 pm
IQs are a lot like dicks, if someone tells you about theirs on the Internet they're exaggerating.
sandmann wrote:Zak S wrote:I'm not a dick, I'm really nice.Zak S wrote:(...) once you have decided that you will spend any part of your life trolling on the internet, you forfeit all rights as a human.If you should get hit by a car--no-one should help you. If you vote on anything--your vote should be thrown away.
If you wanted to participate in a conversation, you've lost that right. You are a non-human now. You are over and cancelled. No concern of yours can ever matter to any member of the human race ever again.
First, IQ is not standardized. Some tests have a standard deviation every 15 points, some have it every 20. Also, they adjust test results based on the age of the one taking the test. So, if Shrapnel took it while in high school, the IQ they would give him would be higher than what an adult who gave the same answers would get.SlyJohnny wrote:No, you don't. The tests can't reliably measure past about 140, which is about what Stephen Hawkings is.Shrapnel wrote:I have an IQ of 170, tested in high school.
virgil wrote:Lovecraft didn't later add a love triangle between Dagon, Chtulhu, & the Colour-Out-of-Space; only to have it broken up through cyber-bullying by the King in Yellow.
FrankTrollman wrote:If your enemy is fucking Gravity, are you helping or hindering it by putting things on high shelves? I don't fucking know! That's not even a thing. Your enemy can't be Gravity, because that's stupid.
- angelfromanotherpin
- Overlord
- Posts: 9745
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
- Josh_Kablack
- King
- Posts: 5318
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
- Location: Online. duh
An exchange between my 5-year old nephew and his father:
"So humiliating"
"What is, kiddo?"
"I don't even know what humiliating means."
"So humiliating"
"What is, kiddo?"
"I don't even know what humiliating means."
"But transportation issues are social-justice issues. The toll of bad transit policies and worse infrastructure—trains and buses that don’t run well and badly serve low-income neighborhoods, vehicular traffic that pollutes the environment and endangers the lives of cyclists and pedestrians—is borne disproportionately by black and brown communities."
- OgreBattle
- King
- Posts: 6820
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 9:33 am
What percentage of Americans want a universal healthcare system at free/very low cost for users?
Free stuff? I assume everyone wants that.
The real question is, how many Americans want to pay for that free stuff?
If you think healthcare is expensive now, just wait until you see how expensive it is when it is free.
Fuck republicans so much.OgreBattle wrote:What percentage of Americans want a universal healthcare system at free/very low cost for users?
Free stuff? I assume everyone wants that.
The real question is, how many Americans want to pay for that free stuff?
If you think healthcare is expensive now, just wait until you see how expensive it is when it is free.
Spoiler alert, the bottom fucking 60% that would be paying less than they are now would be fucking thrilled to pay for it.
We get it, you rich assholes would rather sit on slightly larger piles of money at the cost of murdering people, stop lying about how poor people would have to pay for it.
The U.S. isn't a democracy and if you think it is, you are a rube.DSMatticus wrote:Kaelik gonna kaelik. Whatcha gonna do?
That's libertarians for you - anarchists who want police protection from their slaves.
- OgreBattle
- King
- Posts: 6820
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 9:33 am
- OgreBattle
- King
- Posts: 6820
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 9:33 am
- Shrapnel
- Prince
- Posts: 3146
- Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 4:14 pm
- Location: Burgess Shale, 500 MYA
- Contact:
An exchange from work today...
A customer: "You know who I am, right?"
Me: "Uh..."
Customer: "I'm [a co-workers] husband..."
Me: "Oh, yeah, I remember."
Customer: "...and you just charged me for a coffee."
Me: "Well, you're not my husband."
A customer: "You know who I am, right?"
Me: "Uh..."
Customer: "I'm [a co-workers] husband..."
Me: "Oh, yeah, I remember."
Customer: "...and you just charged me for a coffee."
Me: "Well, you're not my husband."
Is this wretched demi-bee
Half asleep upon my knee
Some freak from a menagerie?
No! It's Eric, the half a bee
Half asleep upon my knee
Some freak from a menagerie?
No! It's Eric, the half a bee
- OgreBattle
- King
- Posts: 6820
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 9:33 am
Yes, because the problem with Milo is definitely that he's gay. And because gay people are all pedophiles. That's definitely the track you want to go with.
DISREGARD THIS I SUCK COCKS
DISREGARD THIS I SUCK COCKS
Last edited by Grek on Mon Apr 03, 2017 6:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
FrankTrollman wrote:I think Grek already won the thread and we should pack it in.
Chamomile wrote:Grek is a national treasure.
.... Did you miss the part where he defended pedophilia?Grek wrote:Yes, because the problem with Milo is definitely that he's gay. And because gay people are all pedophiles. That's definitely the track you want to go with.
I mean there are definitely issues where republicans went super harder on him for this than everything else he said, almost like they believed everything he said all along, and then believed him when he said this, but were totally fine with the racism, but not fine with the men having sex with young boys thing.
But to claim that someone is only making jokes about a guy who literally defended pedophiles being a pedophile because "all gays are pedophiles" is pretty disingenuous.
The U.S. isn't a democracy and if you think it is, you are a rube.DSMatticus wrote:Kaelik gonna kaelik. Whatcha gonna do?
That's libertarians for you - anarchists who want police protection from their slaves.
-
- King
- Posts: 5271
- Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 5:32 am
He didn't just defend it, he advocated for it.Kaelik wrote:.... Did you miss the part where he defended pedophilia?Grek wrote:Yes, because the problem with Milo is definitely that he's gay. And because gay people are all pedophiles. That's definitely the track you want to go with.
He jumps like a damned dragoon, and charges into battle fighting rather insane monsters with little more than his bare hands and rather nasty spell effects conjured up solely through knowledge and the local plantlife. He unerringly knows where his goal lies, he breathes underwater and is untroubled by space travel, seems to have no limits to his actual endurance and favors killing his enemies by driving both boots square into their skull. His agility is unmatched, and his strength legendary, able to fling about a turtle shell big enough to contain a man with enough force to barrel down a near endless path of unfortunates.
--The horror of Mario
Zak S, Zak Smith, Dndwithpornstars, Zak Sabbath. He is a terrible person and a hack at writing and art. His cultural contributions are less than Justin Bieber's, and he's a shitmuffin. Go go gadget Googlebomb!
--The horror of Mario
Zak S, Zak Smith, Dndwithpornstars, Zak Sabbath. He is a terrible person and a hack at writing and art. His cultural contributions are less than Justin Bieber's, and he's a shitmuffin. Go go gadget Googlebomb!
He defended pedophiles, and said he wasn't personally a victim, that's not the same as advocating for it.Maxus wrote:He didn't just defend it, he advocated for it.Kaelik wrote:.... Did you miss the part where he defended pedophilia?Grek wrote:Yes, because the problem with Milo is definitely that he's gay. And because gay people are all pedophiles. That's definitely the track you want to go with.
The U.S. isn't a democracy and if you think it is, you are a rube.DSMatticus wrote:Kaelik gonna kaelik. Whatcha gonna do?
That's libertarians for you - anarchists who want police protection from their slaves.
Yes. Yes I did. Complaint withdrawn.Kaelik wrote:.... Did you miss the part where he defended pedophilia?
Last edited by Grek on Mon Apr 03, 2017 6:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
FrankTrollman wrote:I think Grek already won the thread and we should pack it in.
Chamomile wrote:Grek is a national treasure.
- Ancient History
- Serious Badass
- Posts: 12708
- Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:57 pm
- rasmuswagner
- Knight-Baron
- Posts: 705
- Joined: Mon May 16, 2011 9:37 am
- Location: Danmark
I think it's sad that a slimy hatepeddler like Milo only got in trouble because he stumbled into a taboo like a dumbass. I also find it disturbing that americans paint sex with teenagers as "pedophilia"; it's at the same time deeply troubling in how it denies reality, and in how it cheapens how fucking horrible actual pedophilia is.Kaelik wrote:.... Did you miss the part where he defended pedophilia?Grek wrote:Yes, because the problem with Milo is definitely that he's gay. And because gay people are all pedophiles. That's definitely the track you want to go with.
I mean there are definitely issues where republicans went super harder on him for this than everything else he said, almost like they believed everything he said all along, and then believed him when he said this, but were totally fine with the racism, but not fine with the men having sex with young boys thing.
But to claim that someone is only making jokes about a guy who literally defended pedophiles being a pedophile because "all gays are pedophiles" is pretty disingenuous.
Every time you play in a "low magic world" with D&D rules (or derivates), a unicorn steps on a kitten and an orphan drops his ice cream cone.
-
- Prince
- Posts: 3697
- Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 3:55 pm
Many of the practical reasons to condemn pedophilia are still present when talking about teenagers closer to the legal age of consent. The practical power disparity and relative naivety and impressionability of the younger party do not lend themselves to a situation where all parties are in an equal position to refuse. It's not a recipe for a healthy situation.rasmuswagner wrote:I think it's sad that a slimy hatepeddler like Milo only got in trouble because he stumbled into a taboo like a dumbass. I also find it disturbing that americans paint sex with teenagers as "pedophilia"; it's at the same time deeply troubling in how it denies reality, and in how it cheapens how fucking horrible actual pedophilia is.Kaelik wrote:.... Did you miss the part where he defended pedophilia?Grek wrote:Yes, because the problem with Milo is definitely that he's gay. And because gay people are all pedophiles. That's definitely the track you want to go with.
I mean there are definitely issues where republicans went super harder on him for this than everything else he said, almost like they believed everything he said all along, and then believed him when he said this, but were totally fine with the racism, but not fine with the men having sex with young boys thing.
But to claim that someone is only making jokes about a guy who literally defended pedophiles being a pedophile because "all gays are pedophiles" is pretty disingenuous.
Kaelik wrote:Because powerful men get away with terrible shit, and even the public domain ones get ignored, and then, when the floodgates open, it turns out there was a goddam flood behind it.
Zak S, Zak Smith, Dndwithpornstars, Zak Sabbath, Justin Bieber, shitmuffin
-
- King
- Posts: 5271
- Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 5:32 am
Hey, if you're an adult, don't fuck thirteen-year-olds. This is not a complicated topic. No, they are not basically adults. No, their sexual development does not make them fair game. Especially don't go on internet forums whining about how people who are offended by adults fucking thirteen-year-olds are cheapening the horror of "actual" pedophilia. Definitely do not join Milo in insinuating that catholic priests are doing a service to the gay community by teaching thirteen-year-olds how to give head. Quibbling between pedophilia and hebephilia is a matter of academic interest; yes, they are different, and yes, they are plausibly entirely different psychological mechanisms or at the very least distinct manifestations of the same underlying mechanism, and that's probably worth understanding. But the ethical imperatives in each case are very clear and not up for debate. No the thirteen-year-old cannot give meaningful consent and yes you can really fuck up their life so put your dick back in your pants you creepy asshole end of discussion.
The band covered by ephebophilia already stretches past the age of consent. No, you shouldn't be fucking highschool freshmen. Highschool freshmen are still stupid and have zero relationships of equal-power with adults and as such there is basically a 0% chance that what you're doing begins to even look defensible and a 99% chance you're a person in a position of authority deliberately or unthinkingly preying on someone who cannot realistically say no without consequences or at least without fearing potential consequences. But college freshmen specifically do not have any inequal relationships that the rest of us adults don't also have, and any scummy bullshit you could do to sleep with one is the same kind of scummy bullshit you could do to anyone else. We have to set the line somewhere, and the place where you start adopting the responsibility of managing your own life and stop being expected to unconditionally obey authority figures is probably a good point for it. And then not sending hischool seniors to prison for sleeping with highschool juniors and shit like that are good common-sense adjustments to the system. Those two kinds of people are going to have a lot of social overlap and don't have particularly inequal relationships and there's no point ruining anyone's life over that.
The band covered by ephebophilia already stretches past the age of consent. No, you shouldn't be fucking highschool freshmen. Highschool freshmen are still stupid and have zero relationships of equal-power with adults and as such there is basically a 0% chance that what you're doing begins to even look defensible and a 99% chance you're a person in a position of authority deliberately or unthinkingly preying on someone who cannot realistically say no without consequences or at least without fearing potential consequences. But college freshmen specifically do not have any inequal relationships that the rest of us adults don't also have, and any scummy bullshit you could do to sleep with one is the same kind of scummy bullshit you could do to anyone else. We have to set the line somewhere, and the place where you start adopting the responsibility of managing your own life and stop being expected to unconditionally obey authority figures is probably a good point for it. And then not sending hischool seniors to prison for sleeping with highschool juniors and shit like that are good common-sense adjustments to the system. Those two kinds of people are going to have a lot of social overlap and don't have particularly inequal relationships and there's no point ruining anyone's life over that.
Last edited by DSMatticus on Sun Apr 30, 2017 10:16 pm, edited 2 times in total.