Why did Pol Pot get away with it all without any punishment?

Mundane & Pointless Stuff I Must Share: The Off Topic Forum

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
Lago PARANOIA
Invincible Overlord
Posts: 10555
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 3:00 am

Why did Pol Pot get away with it all without any punishment?

Post by Lago PARANOIA »

Just... why?
cthulhu
Duke
Posts: 2162
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by cthulhu »

For the same reason the Burmese, North Koreans and Sudanese get away with it today: Governments are really, really reluctant to invade other countries, because its hard going unless it adds something to you of extreme strategic value.

There is no strategic value in any of those countries, so the west is going to sit around and pick its nose.

Note: I don't think strategic value and oil is the same thing. Israel has huge strategic value and no oil.
User avatar
Cynic
Prince
Posts: 2776
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Cynic »

well, the easy answer is that he had political amnesty.

but it's most definitely not proper one.
Ancient History wrote:We were working on Street Magic, and Frank asked me if a houngan had run over my dog.
Neeeek
Knight-Baron
Posts: 900
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 10:45 am

Post by Neeeek »

I imagine because of executive immunity.
Username17
Serious Badass
Posts: 29894
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Username17 »

Because the US and China were trying to take Vietnam's shit, and Pol Pot spent a good portion of his time in power monkey wrenching the Vietnamese. So the US and China protected him during much of his reign of terror.

Kind of like the reign of terror in Gaza or Sudan today. If the government is seen to be in the strategic interests of one of the big three nations, it can usually get away with genocide.

-Username17
Post Reply