Is it seriously the case that WoTC have NEVER come up with an official clarification for this?
![Banging Head :disgusted:](./images/smilies/headbang.gif)
Moderator: Moderators
Amra at [unixtime wrote:1182346735[/unixtime]]I don't see where the rules say "caster level" though. I thought I did, but now I'm sure I don't.
Is it seriously the case that WoTC have NEVER come up with an official clarification for this?![]()
Amra at [unixtime wrote:1182348352[/unixtime]]Thanks for the welcome! You'll excuse me if I just pass out on the floor for a while, won't you?
*thud*
That high whistling sound you just heard was the steam coming out of my ears, and the wet splat thereafter was my brain exploding...
I've got this sudden urge to let off steam about those bloody "Save My Game" articles where the response is both "There's nothing wrong with the rules" and at the same time "it's up to you as DM to fix everything that would need to be fixed if there was anything amiss, which there isn't". And what about the FAQ entries that are Just Plain Fvcking Wrong? I mean, these people must eat, sleep and breathe D&D... how can they not KNOW they're full of sh1t?AAAAAAARGH!
![]()
![]()
Guest wrote:Frank seems to be saying that we should plug in "what the sublime chord's caster level would be if we ignored this rule." That is certainly one way to make the value computable, but I don't see how you could construe the rules as written as actually saying that (if there's some precedent I'm unaware of, feel free to enlighten me).
shirak at [unixtime wrote:1182349866[/unixtime]]
Now, to become a full member you must get warned on the WotC forums for being a perfectly reasonable guy who asked/answered a question. Don't worry, it's depressingly easier than it sounds.
Neeek at [unixtime wrote:1182370150[/unixtime]]shirak at [unixtime wrote:1182349866[/unixtime]]
Now, to become a full member you must get warned on the WotC forums for being a perfectly reasonable guy who asked/answered a question. Don't worry, it's depressingly easier than it sounds.
It is? I've flamed people, evidently once reduced a 13 year old to tears, and started threads that were openly admitted trolls, and not only have I never been warned on the WotC boards, when they were testing their new software, I was invited to help "for [my] contributions to the boards (specifically the Char Op board) and [my] opinions are respected and deserved."
They confuse me to no end. Do I have to start working around the filter to swear or something?
Dragon_Child wrote:I got warned for something I said on this message board,
FrankTrollman at [unixtime wrote:1182359472[/unixtime]]Here's the deal: the glossary of the PHB defines Caster Level as being usually equal to the level of the class. So until you find a rule that says otherwise, that's your caster level.
Koumei wrote:I'm just glad that Jill Stein stayed true to her homeopathic principles by trying to win with .2% of the vote. She just hasn't diluted it enough!
Koumei wrote:I am disappointed in Santorum: he should carry his dead election campaign to term!
Just a heads up... Your post is pregnant... When you miss that many periods it's just a given.
]I want him to tongue-punch my box.
The divine in me says the divine in you should go fuck itself.
Josh_Kablack wrote:You are not a unique and precious snowflake, you are just one more fucking asshole on the internet who presumes themselves to be better than the unwashed masses.
Dragon_Child at [unixtime wrote:1182388172[/unixtime]]I got warned THERE, for something I said HERE. Sorry if it wasn't clear.
Guest (Unregistered) at [unixtime wrote:1182363669[/unixtime]]Amra:
Would it be correct for me to state that we are in agreement, with the exception of what "for the purpose of casting spells" means?
Guest (Unregistered) at [unixtime wrote:1182390746[/unixtime]]FrankTrollman at [unixtime wrote:1182359472[/unixtime]]Here's the deal: the glossary of the PHB defines Caster Level as being usually equal to the level of the class. So until you find a rule that says otherwise, that's your caster level.
Er...but the entire discussion is about a rule that says otherwise, isn't it?![]()
Josh_Kablack wrote:You are not a unique and precious snowflake, you are just one more fucking asshole on the internet who presumes themselves to be better than the unwashed masses.
Cielingcat at [unixtime wrote:1182411884[/unixtime]]You mean "level"?
Josh_Kablack wrote:You are not a unique and precious snowflake, you are just one more fucking asshole on the internet who presumes themselves to be better than the unwashed masses.