Further D&D sacred cows being sacrificed in 5E D&D

General questions, debates, and rants about RPGs

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
ggroy
Knight
Posts: 386
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 3:51 pm

Further D&D sacred cows being sacrificed in 5E D&D

Post by ggroy »

Last edited by ggroy on Sat Mar 13, 2010 8:00 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Psychic Robot
Prince
Posts: 4607
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 10:47 pm

Post by Psychic Robot »

You're quite possibly right, and it makes me want to puke.
Count Arioch wrote:I'm not sure how discussions on whether PR is a terrible person or not is on-topic.
Ant wrote:
Chamomile wrote:Ant, what do we do about Psychic Robot?
You do not seem to do anything.
ggroy
Knight
Posts: 386
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 3:51 pm

Post by ggroy »

Last edited by ggroy on Sat Mar 13, 2010 8:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Psychic Robot
Prince
Posts: 4607
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 10:47 pm

Post by Psychic Robot »

Tide of Iron
Attack: Fort vs. Reflex.
Hit: 4 + Fort damage, and the target creature is slid one square. Increase to 8 + Fort damage at 21st level.
Miss: No damage, and the target does not slide.
Count Arioch wrote:I'm not sure how discussions on whether PR is a terrible person or not is on-topic.
Ant wrote:
Chamomile wrote:Ant, what do we do about Psychic Robot?
You do not seem to do anything.
Roy
Prince
Posts: 2772
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 9:53 pm

Post by Roy »

It needs to be even easier to figure out exactly how play goes at a glance. That way the whiners can say 'it plays differently than it looks' despite any and all evidence the contrary more.
Draco_Argentum wrote:
Mister_Sinister wrote:Clearly, your cock is part of the big barrel the server's busy sucking on.
Can someone tell it to stop using its teeth please?
Juton wrote:Damn, I thought [Pathfailure] accidentally created a feat worth taking, my mistake.
Koumei wrote:Shad, please just punch yourself in the face until you are too dizzy to type. I would greatly appreciate that.
Kaelik wrote:No, bad liar. Stop lying.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type I - doing exactly the opposite of what they said they would do.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type II - change for the sake of change.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type III - the illusion of change.
ggroy
Knight
Posts: 386
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 3:51 pm

Post by ggroy »

Last edited by ggroy on Sat Mar 13, 2010 8:02 pm, edited 3 times in total.
ggroy
Knight
Posts: 386
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 3:51 pm

Post by ggroy »

Last edited by ggroy on Sat Mar 13, 2010 8:02 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Roy
Prince
Posts: 2772
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 9:53 pm

Post by Roy »

Thing is, if you're talking 3.5 there everyone has high Con. And some even have low Str to go with it (see: Most rogues, all non gish casters).
Draco_Argentum wrote:
Mister_Sinister wrote:Clearly, your cock is part of the big barrel the server's busy sucking on.
Can someone tell it to stop using its teeth please?
Juton wrote:Damn, I thought [Pathfailure] accidentally created a feat worth taking, my mistake.
Koumei wrote:Shad, please just punch yourself in the face until you are too dizzy to type. I would greatly appreciate that.
Kaelik wrote:No, bad liar. Stop lying.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type I - doing exactly the opposite of what they said they would do.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type II - change for the sake of change.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type III - the illusion of change.
ggroy
Knight
Posts: 386
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 3:51 pm

Post by ggroy »

Last edited by ggroy on Sat Mar 13, 2010 8:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
ggroy
Knight
Posts: 386
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 3:51 pm

Post by ggroy »

Last edited by ggroy on Sat Mar 13, 2010 8:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
CatharzGodfoot
King
Posts: 5668
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: North Carolina

Post by CatharzGodfoot »

ggroy wrote:
Roy wrote:Thing is, if you're talking 3.5 there everyone has high Con. And some even have low Str to go with it (see: Most rogues, all non gish casters).
I once rolled a 3 for CON, using the roll 4 dice and drop the lowest method.

Double snake eyes. :biggrin:
If nothing else having a 3 Con is amusing with d4 HD because once you start boosting your HP they become impossibly large for your HD & Con.
ggroy
Knight
Posts: 386
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 3:51 pm

Post by ggroy »

Last edited by ggroy on Sat Mar 13, 2010 8:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Roy
Prince
Posts: 2772
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 9:53 pm

Post by Roy »

Minimum is 1 per HD anyways. Even if you got a 4, it would have made no difference. Lucky for you the DM didn't realize enemies can calmly saunter around them. Or you had real defenses.
Draco_Argentum wrote:
Mister_Sinister wrote:Clearly, your cock is part of the big barrel the server's busy sucking on.
Can someone tell it to stop using its teeth please?
Juton wrote:Damn, I thought [Pathfailure] accidentally created a feat worth taking, my mistake.
Koumei wrote:Shad, please just punch yourself in the face until you are too dizzy to type. I would greatly appreciate that.
Kaelik wrote:No, bad liar. Stop lying.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type I - doing exactly the opposite of what they said they would do.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type II - change for the sake of change.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type III - the illusion of change.
Post Reply