Base Casting Bonus

General questions, debates, and rants about RPGs

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
For Valor
Knight-Baron
Posts: 529
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 6:31 pm

Base Casting Bonus

Post by For Valor »

This is a completely alternate system for a d20 (D&D-ish hopefully) combat system. I like the idea of D&D having BAB and augmenting attacks and all... but how about the casting version of such? Base Casting Bonus--BCB. You can have poor, med, or good BCB as per BAB, and it effects what potency your spells are at. So, say at level 20 with full BCB, you can cast a spell at caster level 20, then one at level 15, and your iteratives follow as per usual. This takes a full-round action.

Buffs... I'm not sure about... and the system basically just gives standard D&D casters more spells to cast in a turn (which is a bad idea).

Any suggetions?
Last edited by For Valor on Thu Jul 15, 2010 5:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
Mask wrote:And for the love of all that is good and unholy, just get a fucking hippogrif mount and pretend its a flying worg.
K
King
Posts: 6487
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by K »

Frank and I dabbled with just letting people have a caster level equal to character level. If you don't do that, it basically makes any partial casting worthless in all caster check situations.

Giving out more spells to partial casters is probably a bad idea though.
Last edited by K on Thu Jul 15, 2010 6:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Agrinja
1st Level
Posts: 46
Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 4:52 am

Post by Agrinja »

Interesting idea! As a possible other way to handle it, could be a way to implement an edge system for casting...though that'd likely screw the melee classes pretty hard. Another way might be to grant some nice, but minor bonuses for having a good BCB, like better counterspelling, SR penetration, or a better chance of avoiding screwing up a spell because of damage taken, bad circumstances or whatever.
And lightning split the sky like a mile tall electrostatic spark, booming like thousands of cubic feet of air undergoing thermal expansion.

I could form a lucid, logical, and wise argument to refute your statement, but instead I'm going to take the moral low-ground and call your mother a whore.
User avatar
mean_liar
Duke
Posts: 2187
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: Boston

Post by mean_liar »

Has anyone ever used the similar system from Unearthed Arcana?
User avatar
RobbyPants
King
Posts: 5201
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 6:11 pm

Post by RobbyPants »

Do you mean the Magic Rating variant? I have not. I've only tried Spell Points and Recharge.
User avatar
Lokathor
Duke
Posts: 2185
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 2:10 am
Location: ID
Contact:

Post by Lokathor »

Possibilty: Generate a uniform spell slot chart from 1 to 20, and you get slots based on your BCB. Your Caster Level is always equal to your level though, so your low slot spells have the oomph they should (though they're sill low slot).

Then you can do the normal things like adjusting the spell level of different spells and such when you hand them out to the various classes. And maybe it'll all work out.
[*]The Ends Of The Matrix: Github and Rendered
[*]After Sundown: Github and Rendered
User avatar
Lich-Loved
Knight
Posts: 314
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 4:50 pm

Post by Lich-Loved »

RobbyPants wrote:Do you mean the Magic Rating variant? I have not. I've only tried Spell Points and Recharge.
Can you discuss your experience with either or both of these systems, please? Perhaps a new thread is in order, but I would like to hear how these systems fared in-game.
- LL
User avatar
Crissa
King
Posts: 6720
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: Santa Cruz

Post by Crissa »

I did an alternate where everyone got spontaneous casting, and had spells per day following the cleric chart, no bonus spells. Choosing a casting class only gave you access to it's spells per day chart and bonuses (but limited to its casting, refresh style), and you could take domains as feats. And I turned some feats into domains.

-Crissa
User avatar
RobbyPants
King
Posts: 5201
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 6:11 pm

Post by RobbyPants »

Lich-Loved wrote:
RobbyPants wrote:Do you mean the Magic Rating variant? I have not. I've only tried Spell Points and Recharge.
Can you discuss your experience with either or both of these systems, please? Perhaps a new thread is in order, but I would like to hear how these systems fared in-game.
okay.
CCarter
Knight
Posts: 454
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 10:41 pm

Post by CCarter »

Ditto what someone said about more spells/turn for casters being a bad idea. As well as the power factor, each spell involves choices which will slow down turns.

Giving fighters "poor" BCB (or Magic Rating) did look to me like it has the issue of strongly encouraging fighters to multiclass out at higher levels, so they can take a wizard level and exploit their caster level bonus.

I'm also not sure how a BCB would handle multicasters like cleric/wizards...(and I forget how UA did it).

As another option, you could have caster level for wizard being tied to (say) Spellcraft ranks, say skill rank -3, then do the same for clerics with Knowledge (religion) or druids with Knowledge (nature). Not sure what skill you'd use for sorcerors, given that their magic is more innate that learned.
User avatar
Archmage
Knight-Baron
Posts: 757
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 11:05 pm

Post by Archmage »

Basing caster level on spellcraft ranks somehow is going to screw multiclassed casters even more, really.
P.C. Hodgell wrote:That which can be destroyed by the truth should be.
shadzar wrote:i think the apostrophe is an outdated idea such as is hyphenation.
User avatar
Crissa
King
Posts: 6720
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: Santa Cruz

Post by Crissa »

Because they have to put two points into it every other level instead of one point per level?

-Crissa
User avatar
Psychic Robot
Prince
Posts: 4607
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 10:47 pm

Post by Psychic Robot »

So, say at level 20 with full BCB, you can cast a spell at caster level 20, then one at level 15, and your iteratives follow as per usual. This takes a full-round action.
This feels like a bad idea.
Count Arioch wrote:I'm not sure how discussions on whether PR is a terrible person or not is on-topic.
Ant wrote:
Chamomile wrote:Ant, what do we do about Psychic Robot?
You do not seem to do anything.
User avatar
Zeir
NPC
Posts: 18
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 8:51 am

Post by Zeir »

What if the iteratives were just blasting evocations? It seems like no one likes those, might as well give people something to do with them.
User avatar
RobbyPants
King
Posts: 5201
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 6:11 pm

Post by RobbyPants »

CCarter wrote:Not sure what skill you'd use for sorcerors, given that their magic is more innate that learned.
Concentration, perhaps, but every caster already wants Concentration.
CCarter
Knight
Posts: 454
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 10:41 pm

Post by CCarter »

RobbyPants wrote:Concentration, perhaps, but every caster already wants Concentration.
Seems semi-reasonable to me, actually. In the grand scheme of things that might even be a balancing factor .

Oh and Perform for bard, obviously.
Username17
Serious Badass
Posts: 29894
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Username17 »

If multiclassing casters were in any way balanced, this sort of thing would not be. Let's consider the case where a player takes a level of Ranger or some damn thing with their Wizard. Not generally a good idea, but there are reasons to do it. Now, one level of a warrior class doesn't give a caster level, right? But a second one does. So why would you take another level of d4 hit points and nothing but a caster level, when a second level of Ranger with mad stacks of skill points, 2 extra hit points, better abilities and a BAB would get you the same spells?

The multiclassing rules don't really work with spellcasters. But the solution isn't this.

-Username17
User avatar
Crissa
King
Posts: 6720
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: Santa Cruz

Post by Crissa »

Frank, you made a single statement to a varied suggestion. If access to spells was restricted by levels in classes - like feats in warrior classes - why wouldn't it be a possible solution?

-Crissa
Username17
Serious Badass
Posts: 29894
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Username17 »

Crissa wrote:Frank, you made a single statement to a varied suggestion. If access to spells was restricted by levels in classes - like feats in warrior classes - why wouldn't it be a possible solution?

-Crissa
So your new suggestion is that you need 7 levels of Wizard to get 4th level wizard spells and 9 levels of wizard to get 5th level wizard spells? Gosh, that would make taking your 8th level as Ranger in all ways superior to taking your 8th level in Wizard in a game that wasn't going to reach 9th level, and really painfully bad in a game that was.

Giving players differing levels of power based on whether they can guess when the campaign is over is on the whole a bad thing.

-Username17
User avatar
Crissa
King
Posts: 6720
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: Santa Cruz

Post by Crissa »

It's better to know these problems specifically, than to poo-poo the whole idea without mentioning it.

-Crissa
Post Reply