Why do you need a label?
Moderator: Moderators
Why do you need a label?
I believe that people are anxious to define and categorize you. it makes you easier to control or destroy.
"Come... Submit... Obey... I am your friend and master. Your thoughts are like water to me."
- RobbyPants
- King
- Posts: 5201
- Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 6:11 pm
It has to do with Dunbar's number (or the monkeysphere). Basically, people can only maintain so many meaningful relationships before they start to view people in fairly simple terms. Labels help with that. It doesn't make their impressions any less prejudiced, but it's just going to happen.
Labeling stuff helps you understand it. Or helps you think you understand it. The benefits of this behavior can be seen in kids most easily.
While my father-in-law was here, he made a comment to the effect that children had a greater attention span - especially for the natural world - before they learned the names of things.
But watching my son learn has taught me that giving names to things enables him to use the label like a building block to conceptuality. Labels take concrete ideas and translate them into abstract ones. And that ability to abstract is the most powerful tool in our shed, so to speak.
So while labels can totally suck, there is no way remove that ability from humans without rendering us completely incompetent. This, of course, puts those who label me incorrectly in the category of "small-minded" and "not very observant or knowledgeable."
![Tongue :tongue:](./images/smilies/tongue1.gif)
While my father-in-law was here, he made a comment to the effect that children had a greater attention span - especially for the natural world - before they learned the names of things.
But watching my son learn has taught me that giving names to things enables him to use the label like a building block to conceptuality. Labels take concrete ideas and translate them into abstract ones. And that ability to abstract is the most powerful tool in our shed, so to speak.
So while labels can totally suck, there is no way remove that ability from humans without rendering us completely incompetent. This, of course, puts those who label me incorrectly in the category of "small-minded" and "not very observant or knowledgeable."
![Tongue :tongue:](./images/smilies/tongue1.gif)
My son makes me laugh. Maybe he'll make you laugh, too.
The simplest explanation is that when you talk to people or about people you need a point of reference. Just calling somebody a human being/man/woman/child/manbearpig is too vague. Flea is a great human being because he exhibits all the biological markers that make a human. But that also applies to you and me. But it is better to think of him as a good trumpet and bass guitar player. Or even that half-naked guy on RHCP who has a lot of tattoos. If I'm talking about him, I can't just refer to him as that music guy who did that thing in London and paris in his underpants. Actually that's pretty decent a label because of giving it very specific markers (music guy, doing something specific in london & paris, in his underpants)
Ancient History wrote:We were working on Street Magic, and Frank asked me if a houngan had run over my dog.
Brown people - terrorists.
Black people - gangsters, drug dealers, pimps.
Blondes - stupid.
Though it serves a necessary function, the practice of labeling seems to take a notably negative light when applied unto humans.
Black people - gangsters, drug dealers, pimps.
Blondes - stupid.
Though it serves a necessary function, the practice of labeling seems to take a notably negative light when applied unto humans.
"Come... Submit... Obey... I am your friend and master. Your thoughts are like water to me."
- Ganbare Gincun
- Duke
- Posts: 1022
- Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 4:42 am
Sadly, they do.Molochio wrote:Fox news still exists? I haven't watched television in a decade or so.
He jumps like a damned dragoon, and charges into battle fighting rather insane monsters with little more than his bare hands and rather nasty spell effects conjured up solely through knowledge and the local plantlife. He unerringly knows where his goal lies, he breathes underwater and is untroubled by space travel, seems to have no limits to his actual endurance and favors killing his enemies by driving both boots square into their skull. His agility is unmatched, and his strength legendary, able to fling about a turtle shell big enough to contain a man with enough force to barrel down a near endless path of unfortunates.
--The horror of Mario
Zak S, Zak Smith, Dndwithpornstars, Zak Sabbath. He is a terrible person and a hack at writing and art. His cultural contributions are less than Justin Bieber's, and he's a shitmuffin. Go go gadget Googlebomb!
--The horror of Mario
Zak S, Zak Smith, Dndwithpornstars, Zak Sabbath. He is a terrible person and a hack at writing and art. His cultural contributions are less than Justin Bieber's, and he's a shitmuffin. Go go gadget Googlebomb!
Human beings can't communicate directly, we require a medium in which to translate our thoughts(even the label here "thoughts" is inadequate for what I'm trying to express). Every idea you are able to express is in and of itself a label for a greater concept, hell, you really don't need to translate an idea into an expressible format for it to be a label; any experience you have to generate an idea has already been filtered through your perceptions and personal bias, been twisted into something that makes sense to you so it can be properly labeled and fitted into the structure of your brain. Everything you are is labels because you have no way of experiencing an objective reality. Your real complaint is other people using labels that are simpler than you wish them to. In the end, that's just a personal preference.
-
- Knight-Baron
- Posts: 968
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Humans do tend to give negative labels to people who aren't part of their in-group more often than positive ones. They tend to give positive labels to people in their in-group more often than negative ones. It's a significant problem that needs to be fixed if we ever want to be a galaxy-spanning civilization of supercyborgs.Molochio wrote:Brown people - terrorists.
Black people - gangsters, drug dealers, pimps.
Blondes - stupid.
Though it serves a necessary function, the practice of labeling seems to take a notably negative light when applied unto humans.
Oh, and: welcome to social psychology.
![Sick :P](./images/smilies/sick.gif)
-
- Duke
- Posts: 1725
- Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 7:18 pm
Re: Why do you need a label?
Is this some sort of repudiation to the idea that you are not a beautiful or unique snowflake?Molochio wrote:I believe that people are anxious to define and categorize you. it makes you easier to control or destroy.
Or is this an assertation that a label, no matter how accurate or precise, can effectively encapsulate the whole of someone of something?
Labels are super fucking useful. Do you go and check every fire you find to see if it burns because labeling it would be harmful? Labels are super fucking useful, so its' no wonder people apply them to people, where they often work fine. When I see someone covered in tatoos with a nazi patch on their jacket and riding a motorbike (I've actually had this happen) I usually assume that they're a bikie.
- CatharzGodfoot
- King
- Posts: 5668
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
- Location: North Carolina
Labels is important because it allows recursive procedures to be defined in a local namespace. This is good when, for example, writing tail-recursive procedures with accumulators.tzor wrote:Why do I need a label? Because when I just purchased 20 or more chances from a local charity it's a pain in the wrist to have to write my name, address and phone number on them all.
The law in its majestic equality forbids the rich as well as the poor from stealing bread, begging and sleeping under bridges.
-Anatole France
Mount Flamethrower on rear
Drive in reverse
Win Game.
-Josh Kablack
-Anatole France
Mount Flamethrower on rear
Drive in reverse
Win Game.
-Josh Kablack