Mechanics that just don't work

General questions, debates, and rants about RPGs

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
Wiseman
Duke
Posts: 1417
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2012 4:43 pm
Location: That one place
Contact:

Mechanics that just don't work

Post by Wiseman »

So I'm curious. We hear complaints of things being broken and so on... But what are some mechanics in gamebooks that are simply unplayable as written? I'm not talking about power levels (though feel free to post extreme examples of over or underpoweredness) what im talking about is rules that just don't work, make no sense, or are downright unplayable as written.

For example, the mass combat system in the Infernum D20 game. First of all, it's ridiculously complex to just make your unit in the first place. There there's all sorts of confusing situational modifiers, facing, unit formations, hp stages, and abilities.

But what makes it hilariously unplayable is the fact that you end up with units with thousands of hit points and pathetic damage. And each round of combat is supposed to represent about 5 hours of war.

Even the the sample unit doesn't help clarify it, with 5000 hit points and a pathetic 1d8+6 damage.
Last edited by Wiseman on Thu Apr 18, 2013 2:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
zugschef
Knight-Baron
Posts: 821
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2013 1:53 pm

Post by zugschef »

shadow conjuration/evocation
Last edited by zugschef on Thu Apr 18, 2013 2:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Wrathzog
Knight-Baron
Posts: 605
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 5:57 am

Post by Wrathzog »

The Core Mechanic.
PSY DUCK?
User avatar
Juton
Duke
Posts: 1415
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 3:08 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

Post by Juton »

In 3.5 the literal reading of wealth by level. With the literal reading a character is supposed to have X gp in gear. If a PC lost all their gold betting on centaur racing then the MC is supposed to give them the gold needed to bring them back in line with their peers. This allows the Flask Rogue to function at the lower levels, since at every level the MC is supposed to top them off financially It would also allow you to really burn through scrolls and potions.
Oh thank God, finally a thread about how Fighters in D&D suck. This was a long time coming. - Schwarzkopf
Korgan0
Duke
Posts: 2101
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 7:42 am

Post by Korgan0 »

I'm not sure if SR4 hacking counts (it's an absolute clusterfuck but it's kinda playable in the strictest sense of the word), but it might well do.
User avatar
Wiseman
Duke
Posts: 1417
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2012 4:43 pm
Location: That one place
Contact:

Post by Wiseman »

Okay, you're going to have to elaborate. I don't know what many of these things do.
Username17
Serious Badass
Posts: 29894
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Username17 »

Well, Shadowrun's Matrix rules were gone over step by step Here. It is an unplayable mess, and laughably terrible.

-Username17
User avatar
rasmuswagner
Knight-Baron
Posts: 705
Joined: Mon May 16, 2011 9:37 am
Location: Danmark

Post by rasmuswagner »

Dice pool systems with multiple axis of difficulty (x hits needed, -y dice, need to roll z to get a hit).
Every time you play in a "low magic world" with D&D rules (or derivates), a unicorn steps on a kitten and an orphan drops his ice cream cone.
squirrelloid
Master
Posts: 191
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by squirrelloid »

4e. All of it except the combat simulator. Especially skill challenges, the Parcel system of loot, and all NPCs being literally unkillable friendlies.
squirrelloid
Master
Posts: 191
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by squirrelloid »

Juton wrote:In 3.5 the literal reading of wealth by level. With the literal reading a character is supposed to have X gp in gear. If a PC lost all their gold betting on centaur racing then the MC is supposed to give them the gold needed to bring them back in line with their peers. This allows the Flask Rogue to function at the lower levels, since at every level the MC is supposed to top them off financially It would also allow you to really burn through scrolls and potions.
I kind of disagree. There's *no other wealth system that works* so long as a fundamental assumption of your system is that wealth -> power. (And eliminating the connection between wealth and power is really hard in a game like D+D).
ishy
Duke
Posts: 2404
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2011 2:59 pm

Post by ishy »

Juton wrote:In 3.5 the literal reading of wealth by level. With the literal reading a character is supposed to have X gp in gear. If a PC lost all their gold betting on centaur racing then the MC is supposed to give them the gold needed to bring them back in line with their peers.
So in your games, if I lost all my gold betting on centaur racing, I'd have to make a new character? Or play with a character who is far behind everyone else for the rest of the campaign, since I have so much less money?
Last edited by ishy on Thu Apr 18, 2013 7:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
Gary Gygax wrote:The player’s path to role-playing mastery begins with a thorough understanding of the rules of the game
Bigode wrote:I wouldn't normally make that blanket of a suggestion, but you seem to deserve it: scroll through the entire forum, read anything that looks interesting in term of design experience, then come back.
Red_Rob
Prince
Posts: 2594
Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2009 10:07 pm

Post by Red_Rob »

In 2e so long as you didn't bet your magic items you would almost never be less personally powerful if you gave away money. Magic items couldn't be bought or sold, only traded for other magic items, so noone really cared what you did with your gold.

Regarding the topic at hand, in Hero System buying stats used to provide you with certain "figured characteristics" that derived from those stats. Because it was a point-buy system you could get points back by lowering your stats. I seem to remember some funkiness where you could buy a point in a stat and then get more points than you paid for the stat by lowering all the figured characteristics back to their starting values. Repeat for infinite points!

A non-RPG example was 2nd edition 40k using different systems to denote weapon damage to vehicles and infantry. This seems like a good idea until you get to Terminators and Dreadnoughts. Terminators are very heavily armored infantry, whilst Dreadnoughts are a small mech, basically a larger version of the same thing. Because of the differences in rules, weapons that were great against one were poor against the other and vice versa, which was very unintuitive.
Simplified Tome Armor.

Tome item system and expanded Wish Economy rules.

Try our fantasy card game Clash of Nations! Available via Print on Demand.

“Those Who Can Make You Believe Absurdities, Can Make You Commit Atrocities” - Voltaire
User avatar
Juton
Duke
Posts: 1415
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 3:08 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

Post by Juton »

ishy wrote:So in your games, if I lost all my gold betting on centaur racing, I'd have to make a new character? Or play with a character who is far behind everyone else for the rest of the campaign, since I have so much less money?
Yes.

Usually we'd play an adventure paths or modules, so there where set treasures or magic items they could find. If you play a sundertard you may be below WBL. If you waste your gold on stupid stuff you won't hit your WBL. The flip side of this is that the games I've played are usually pretty generous with gold, getting to or surpassing your WBL isn't hard at all.

Do you play in a game where your character's wealth is automatically set to the WBL guidelines every level? How does it work, is there an IC explanation?
Last edited by Juton on Thu Apr 18, 2013 10:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
Oh thank God, finally a thread about how Fighters in D&D suck. This was a long time coming. - Schwarzkopf
User avatar
hogarth
Prince
Posts: 4582
Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 1:00 pm
Location: Toronto

Post by hogarth »

Most of these so far seem to fall into the category of "I don't like it" rather than "it's unplayable".

I'll vote for the 1E AD&D psionics rules, where people using psionics get ten times as many actions as everyone else in the party.

A second vote goes to the Heightened Speed power in Villains & Vigilantes. In D&D, a fast character moves something like 12-18 squares per move action. In V&V, a character with Heightened Speed can move around 1000 squares per move action (if he rolled lucky), not to mention getting an extra six actions every turn (e.g. 8 actions instead of 2).
Last edited by hogarth on Thu Apr 18, 2013 11:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
Username17
Serious Badass
Posts: 29894
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Username17 »

hogarth wrote:Most of these so far seem to fall into the category of "I don't like it" rather than "it's unplayable".
Yes. Wealth By Level doesn't work the way people think it should, and it is surprisingly breakable in a bunch of ways, but it functions at all. Roy used to rage all the time about Sundertards on the grounds that it was deeply absurd that blowing up gear you didn't like gave you more gear that you did like, but that is how the rules worked. The fact that blowing all your money on "temporary" bonuses actually was the best way to expand your long term wealth position is deeply unintuitive and counter-immersive, but the rules did "work" by any conceivable definition.
I'll vote for the 1E AD&D psionics rules, where people using psionics get ten times as many actions as everyone else in the party.
Do they? I could never even figure out how AD&D 1st edition Psionic rules were supposed to work. They were missing all kinds of key information in explaining how the fuck they were supposed to function. I would definitely say that the rules didn't "work", because I've never met two people who parsed them the same way when trying to figure out what the fuck.
A second vote goes to the Heightened Speed power in Villains & Vigilantes. In D&D, a fast character moves something like 12-18 squares per move action. In V&V, a character with Heightened Speed can move around 1000 squares per move action (if he rolled lucky), not to mention getting an extra six actions every turn (e.g. 8 actions instead of 2).
See, that just seems like something that is "very powerful", and "a pain in the ass", rather than a rule that actually doesn't work. It sounds like you know what it does and how to apply it in game. The problem is just that it's obviously massively more powerful than comparably priced options? I mean fuck, there's lots of shit like that.

Champions technically allows you to have powers like Aid and Multiform to transform yourself into a version of you who is built on more points. That shit has a little symbol next to the abilities in question to ask the GM to go over it and make sure the game isn't being raped - but it's pretty clear that abusive powers exist in the system.

To my mind, things only count as "unplayable" if they actually cannot be played. AD&D Psionics were unplayable because no one knew what they supposed to mean. The Shadowrun Matrix is unplayable because there's actually no limit to the number of times you have to roll an opposed test before you're allowed to make an attack. If you can't parse it, or find out that you have an unlimited (or effectively unlimited) number of steps to carry out, you can't play it. Everyone else is just bellyaching.

-Username17
User avatar
Ancient History
Serious Badass
Posts: 12708
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:57 pm

Post by Ancient History »

Shadowrun has a bunch of rules which are basically nonexistent - anything involved dual-natured stuff interacting with astral stuff and vice versa, the rules-as-written don't cover a lot of situations, and stuff like the FAB netgun didn't help any.
User avatar
hogarth
Prince
Posts: 4582
Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 1:00 pm
Location: Toronto

Post by hogarth »

FrankTrollman wrote:
I'll vote for the 1E AD&D psionics rules, where people using psionics get ten times as many actions as everyone else in the party.
Do they?
1E psionics work in segments instead of rounds.
FrankTrollman wrote:
A second vote goes to the Heightened Speed power in Villains & Vigilantes. In D&D, a fast character moves something like 12-18 squares per move action. In V&V, a character with Heightened Speed can move around 1000 squares per move action (if he rolled lucky), not to mention getting an extra six actions every turn (e.g. 8 actions instead of 2).
See, that just seems like something that is "very powerful", and "a pain in the ass", rather than a rule that actually doesn't work.
V&V came with little cardboard tokens 1" x 1" that you're supposed to use as miniatures. But all that goes out the window when you need a battle map 83 feet long just to fit in a single move for one of the characters.

Can you work around it by making up your own shit? Of course, but that applies for every mechanic that doesn't work, bar none. (See: rule zero.)
Last edited by hogarth on Thu Apr 18, 2013 1:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Stahlseele
King
Posts: 5988
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 4:51 pm
Location: Hamburg, Germany

Post by Stahlseele »

Shadowruns Vehicle Combat Rules . .
They were and are just as bad as Matrix Stuff.
Welcome, to IronHell.
Shrapnel wrote:
TFwiki wrote:Soon is the name of the region in the time-domain (familiar to all marketing departments, and to the moderators and staff of Fun Publications) which sees release of all BotCon news, club exclusives, and other fan desirables. Soon is when then will become now.

Peculiar properties of spacetime ensure that the perception of the magnitude of Soon is fluid and dependent, not on an individual's time-reference, but on spatial and cultural location. A marketer generally perceives Soon as a finite, known, yet unspeakable time-interval; to a fan, the interval appears greater, and may in fact approach the infinite, becoming Never. Once the interval has passed, however, a certain time-lensing effect seems to occur, and the time-interval becomes vanishingly small. We therefore see the strange result that the same fragment of spacetime may be observed, in quick succession, as Soon, Never, and All Too Quickly.
Lago PARANOIA
Invincible Overlord
Posts: 10555
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 3:00 am

Post by Lago PARANOIA »

4E D&D's magic item acquisition system is IMO the thinnest that you can shave the line between 'playable' and 'unplayable' while still being on the side of playable. It's massively unfair to people in the group, counter-intuitive, destroys any sense of joy, has a wildly unpredictable effect on gameplay (especially if you just stick to core rules), etc.. but at least the outputs are knowable.

d20 Modern's wealth acquisition system is literally unplayable. It only 'works' because if you're playing core-rules only with Mindwreckers or Urban Arcana, you can pretty much get what you want without interacting with the system. If you plan to use the epic spell creation system and/or the magic item system, though, it utterly and completely wrecks the game.
Josh Kablack wrote:Your freedom to make rulings up on the fly is in direct conflict with my freedom to interact with an internally consistent narrative. Your freedom to run/play a game without needing to understand a complex rule system is in direct conflict with my freedom to play a character whose abilities and flaws function as I intended within that ruleset. Your freedom to add and change rules in the middle of the game is in direct conflict with my ability to understand that rules system before I decided whether or not to join your game.

In short, your entire post is dismissive of not merely my intelligence, but my agency. And I don't mean agency as a player within one of your games, I mean my agency as a person. You do not want me to be informed when I make the fundamental decisions of deciding whether to join your game or buying your rules system.
User avatar
hogarth
Prince
Posts: 4582
Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 1:00 pm
Location: Toronto

Post by hogarth »

Lago PARANOIA wrote:d20 Modern's wealth acquisition system is literally unplayable.
That reminds me of the original Top Secret game, where you could buy counterfeit money for ten cents on the dollar and one of the "classes" would get experience from passing counterfeit money. Maybe not unplayable, but ridiculous nevertheless!
ishy
Duke
Posts: 2404
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2011 2:59 pm

Post by ishy »

Spoilered my reply to Juton since it is going a bit off topic.
Juton wrote:
ishy wrote:So in your games, if I lost all my gold betting on centaur racing, I'd have to make a new character? Or play with a character who is far behind everyone else for the rest of the campaign, since I have so much less money?
Yes.

Usually we'd play an adventure paths or modules, so there where set treasures or magic items they could find. If you play a sundertard you may be below WBL. If you waste your gold on stupid stuff you won't hit your WBL. The flip side of this is that the games I've played are usually pretty generous with gold, getting to or surpassing your WBL isn't hard at all.

Do you play in a game where your character's wealth is automatically set to the WBL guidelines every level? How does it work, is there an IC explanation?
I have not no. I have played in games that increased the amount of wealth you'd find if you are below WBL though. And I've also played in games where you occasionally set your WBL to your level. (For example, when I was working in England for 6 months, when I got back, my DM told me, my character gained 4 levels and that I could select gear equal to my new WBL).
The IC explanation would be: your character happens to find more stuff / the maffia is offering you giant bribes for staying out of their way. Or whatever works for the story. The exact same way, you justify finding gear in the first place, just a bit more.

I just don't see the need to screw over the people I play with. For example houseruling sunder into a giant trap instead of the normal default of sometimes useful.
If we're talking about rules that don't work. How about the 3.5 Illusion rules? Or the vision and light rules. How if you're holding a torch, you're in an area of bright light, thus can see people in the dark. While they are in an area of darkness thus can't see your torchlight?
Gary Gygax wrote:The player’s path to role-playing mastery begins with a thorough understanding of the rules of the game
Bigode wrote:I wouldn't normally make that blanket of a suggestion, but you seem to deserve it: scroll through the entire forum, read anything that looks interesting in term of design experience, then come back.
User avatar
Josh_Kablack
King
Posts: 5318
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: Online. duh

Post by Josh_Kablack »

The 3.5 illumination rules where the illumination level of the square where the character making the Spot check matters but the illumination level of the square where the character making the Hide check doesn't matter are crazy, counter intuitive and probably not what the designers intended -- but they are totally playable as written.
"But transportation issues are social-justice issues. The toll of bad transit policies and worse infrastructure—trains and buses that don’t run well and badly serve low-income neighborhoods, vehicular traffic that pollutes the environment and endangers the lives of cyclists and pedestrians—is borne disproportionately by black and brown communities."
Username17
Serious Badass
Posts: 29894
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Username17 »

Josh_Kablack wrote:The 3.5 illumination rules where the illumination level of the square where the character making the Spot check matters but the illumination level of the square where the character making the Hide check doesn't matter are crazy, counter intuitive and probably not what the designers intended -- but they are totally playable as written.
True. But the Spot Distance rules where the distance modifiers are calculated by counting the distance up from zero in one place and calculated by counting down from the limits of line of sight in another are not playable because the modifier can only be one or the other and not both.

-Username17
User avatar
Dean
Duke
Posts: 2065
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 3:14 am

Post by Dean »

I think Stealth in D&D or most systems is a reasonable answer in general. Without even needing to focus on the specifics of illumination and spot modifiers. Stealth in D&D is like baseball if no one ever invented the ball. There's tons of specifics of what someone can do and how far someone can lead off the base but there's no fucking game anywhere because the basic mechanic is nonexistent.
DSMatticus wrote:Fuck you, fuck you, fuck you, fuck you. I am filled with an unfathomable hatred.
User avatar
Kaelik
ArchDemon of Rage
Posts: 14958
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Kaelik »

Josh_Kablack wrote:where the illumination level of the square where the character making the Spot check matters but the illumination level of the square where the character making the Hide check doesn't matter are crazy,
Um... where are you getting this information at all.

If someone is in a dark square, they have total concealment, then you can't see them at all.

If someone is in a brightly lit square, they have no concealment at all, so you can see them without even making a check (I mean, technically, they can't make a hide check, so the DC is 0, but in dungeon, you are unlikely to have line of sight to someone far enough away for that to matter).
DSMatticus wrote:Kaelik gonna kaelik. Whatcha gonna do?
The U.S. isn't a democracy and if you think it is, you are a rube.

That's libertarians for you - anarchists who want police protection from their slaves.
Post Reply