Pathfinder Is Still Bad

General questions, debates, and rants about RPGs

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
virgil
King
Posts: 6339
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by virgil »

Polymorph Any Object makes a call to Greater Polymorph, itself a call to Polymorph that leans heavily on the polymorph subschool. The polymorph subschool says you gain the size, natural weapons (w/proficiency), and anything else is under the purview of "see spell for details." This means PAO is unambiguous if you turn something into an animal, humanoid, elemental, dragon, plant, or magical beast...mostly. Inanimate objects don't have hit dice, which makes the resultant stats difficult to discern when you make a creature out of them. Otherwise, nothing says you gain or lose your original creature type; and both Paizo and community have made it abundantly clear that backwards compatibility was a lie, where 3.5 rules are maybe as valid as a forum-goer's house rules.

I'm currently working with the conclusion that Pathfinder's PAO is mostly 404 errors, requiring DM Fiat.

EDIT: A mild perusal of Paizo forums is showing a non-zero number of people taking the stance that PAO can turn anything into anything...so long as it's greater polymorph (with variant duration); sprites? large dragons? screw you!
Last edited by virgil on Mon Feb 22, 2016 4:34 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Come see Sprockets & Serials
How do you confuse a barbarian?
Put a greatsword a maul and a greataxe in a room and ask them to take their pick
EXPLOSIVE RUNES!
ishy
Duke
Posts: 2404
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2011 2:59 pm

Post by ishy »

Well there is this post by Jason Buhlman:
[url=http://paizo.com/threads/rzs2jv5i?Polymorph-need-clarification#4 wrote:Jason buhlman[/url]]Stardust is correct. Polymorph spells do not change your type.

Jason Bulmahn
Lead Designer
Paizo Publishing
But keep in mind, pathfinder polymorph rules are poorly written BS.
Here is an example:
phb magic section wrote:When you cast a polymorph spell that changes you into a creature of the animal, dragon, elemental, magical beast, plant, or vermin type, all of your gear melds into your body.
Note that this text is oddly specific and thus it is undefined what happens to your gear if you cast a polymorph spell on someone else or say wild shape.
Gary Gygax wrote:The player’s path to role-playing mastery begins with a thorough understanding of the rules of the game
Bigode wrote:I wouldn't normally make that blanket of a suggestion, but you seem to deserve it: scroll through the entire forum, read anything that looks interesting in term of design experience, then come back.
GâtFromKI
Knight-Baron
Posts: 513
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 10:14 am

Post by GâtFromKI »

virgil wrote:I'm currently working with the conclusion that Pathfinder's PAO is mostly 404 errors, requiring DM Fiat.
This is the conclusion I have reached; PAO does a 404 error when transforming an object into a creature, and when transforming anything into a demon/undead/ooze/construct/other exotic stuff.

Under the most conservative ruling, you gain nothing when you morph into an exotic monster, except for the stuff indicated in the polymorph subschool (like natural attacks). So you can use it to transform into a balor, but it's just a new skin and your stats aren't modified. Anyway, an animated object is a construct with an [undefined, up to infinity] number of natural attacks, so PAO is broken even under the most conservative ruling.
User avatar
rasmuswagner
Knight-Baron
Posts: 705
Joined: Mon May 16, 2011 9:37 am
Location: Danmark

Post by rasmuswagner »

You assholes are seriously suggesting that 3.5 polymorph rules are any good, and that makes you even bigger retards than the people who think Buhlman and Mearls are competent game designers.
Every time you play in a "low magic world" with D&D rules (or derivates), a unicorn steps on a kitten and an orphan drops his ice cream cone.
Mask_De_H
Duke
Posts: 1995
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 7:17 pm

Post by Mask_De_H »

rasmuswagner wrote:You assholes are seriously suggesting that 3.5 polymorph rules are any good, and that makes you even bigger retards than the people who think Buhlman and Mearls are competent game designers.
Er, only in the sense that PF managed to fuck up even harder. It's comparing a dumpster fire to a toxic waste fire.
FrankTrollman wrote: Halfling women, as I'm sure you are aware, combine all the "fun" parts of pedophilia without any of the disturbing, illegal, or immoral parts.
K wrote:That being said, the usefulness of airships for society is still transporting cargo because it's an option that doesn't require a powerful wizard to show up for work on time instead of blowing the day in his harem of extraplanar sex demons/angels.
Chamomile wrote: See, it's because K's belief in leaving generation of individual monsters to GMs makes him Chaotic, whereas Frank's belief in the easier usability of monsters pre-generated by game designers makes him Lawful, and clearly these philosophies are so irreconcilable as to be best represented as fundamentally opposed metaphysical forces.
Whipstitch wrote:You're on a mad quest, dude. I'd sooner bet on Zeus getting bored and letting Sisyphus put down the fucking rock.
Username17
Serious Badass
Posts: 29894
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Username17 »

rasmuswagner wrote:You assholes are seriously suggesting that 3.5 polymorph rules are any good, and that makes you even bigger retards than the people who think Buhlman and Mearls are competent game designers.
No. The implication is that the 3.5 polymorph rules say what they do. It's totally broken and there are a few things that people mind caulk away like natural spellcasting abilities. But questions are answerable and house rules can be made. Paizo polymorph rules are gibberish.

-Username17
User avatar
rasmuswagner
Knight-Baron
Posts: 705
Joined: Mon May 16, 2011 9:37 am
Location: Danmark

Post by rasmuswagner »

FrankTrollman wrote:
rasmuswagner wrote:You assholes are seriously suggesting that 3.5 polymorph rules are any good, and that makes you even bigger retards than the people who think Buhlman and Mearls are competent game designers.
No. The implication is that the 3.5 polymorph rules say what they do. It's totally broken and there are a few things that people mind caulk away like natural spellcasting abilities. But questions are answerable and house rules can be made. Paizo polymorph rules are gibberish.

-Username17
The Polymorph spells that anyone actually uses - [foo] Shape X, Alter Self, Baleful Polymorph - work just fine. Polymorph Any Object has always been a pain in the ass. and yes, the PF version fails by not having Undead actually be a functional option. But it takes all of 5 fucking seconds to rule that if you use the spell to polymorph into an undead, you use the rules that fucking exist for polymorphing into an undead creature.

I did not expect the retarded assertion that PAO doesn't use the Polymorph rules, but rather some ass-pulled "change into" rules, would pop up here too.

In contrast, the 3.5 polymorph rules technically work, but it takes a written and notarized 20-page gentleman's agreement to prevent them from completely fucking everything.
Every time you play in a "low magic world" with D&D rules (or derivates), a unicorn steps on a kitten and an orphan drops his ice cream cone.
User avatar
Kaelik
ArchDemon of Rage
Posts: 14832
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Kaelik »

rasmuswagner wrote:You assholes are seriously suggesting that 3.5 polymorph rules are any good, and that makes you even bigger retards than the people who think Buhlman and Mearls are competent game designers.
Kaelik wrote:So in conclusion... If you cast Polymorph Any Object to turn into an undead, the universe explodes, you light your Pathfinder book on fire, and go play a game with better polymorph rules, which... is sadly 3e. Because wholly shit, how do you make polymorph rules less functional than fucking 3e? Apparently by hiring the 3e team to write more failures of polymorph rules.
Or, in the alternative, you are a fucking idiot.
rasmuswagner wrote:The Polymorph spells that anyone actually uses - [foo] Shape X, Alter Self, Baleful Polymorph - work just fine. Polymorph Any Object has always been a pain in the ass. and yes, the PF version fails by not having Undead actually be a functional option. But it takes all of 5 fucking seconds to rule that if you use the spell to polymorph into an undead, you use the rules that fucking exist for polymorphing into an undead creature.

I did not expect the retarded assertion that PAO doesn't use the Polymorph rules, but rather some ass-pulled "change into" rules, would pop up here too.

In contrast, the 3.5 polymorph rules technically work, but it takes a written and notarized 20-page gentleman's agreement to prevent them from completely fucking everything.
Dude.... You are a fucking idiot.

PAO literally can't work on objects at all. It also can't work on undead, but even if you just houserule the fuck out of it, it still runs into all the problems with the rest of Pathfinders shitty polymorph options like:

Alter Self turns Dragons into people, because whatever.

All the X shape spells are pathetic, and don't let you actually turn into different creatures, because of arbitrary nonsense size restrictions that are backed into every spell for pretty much no reason.

Like, great, you have some shitty buff spells that aren't worth casting, but bring a disguise check too. What the fuck ever, you still can't use it for the things you might actually want to use Polymorph for.

But hey, Baleful Polymorph works, so Pathfinder fixed Polymorph, because after all Baleful Polymorph didn't work in 3e... oh wait.
DSMatticus wrote:Kaelik gonna kaelik. Whatcha gonna do?
The U.S. isn't a democracy and if you think it is, you are a rube.

That's libertarians for you - anarchists who want police protection from their slaves.
User avatar
rasmuswagner
Knight-Baron
Posts: 705
Joined: Mon May 16, 2011 9:37 am
Location: Danmark

Post by rasmuswagner »

Kaelik wrote:
rasmuswagner wrote:The Polymorph spells that anyone actually uses - [foo] Shape X, Alter Self, Baleful Polymorph - work just fine. Polymorph Any Object has always been a pain in the ass. and yes, the PF version fails by not having Undead actually be a functional option. But it takes all of 5 fucking seconds to rule that if you use the spell to polymorph into an undead, you use the rules that fucking exist for polymorphing into an undead creature.

I did not expect the retarded assertion that PAO doesn't use the Polymorph rules, but rather some ass-pulled "change into" rules, would pop up here too.

In contrast, the 3.5 polymorph rules technically work, but it takes a written and notarized 20-page gentleman's agreement to prevent them from completely fucking everything.
Dude.... You are a fucking idiot.

PAO literally can't work on objects at all. It also can't work on undead, but even if you just houserule the fuck out of it, it still runs into all the problems with the rest of Pathfinders shitty polymorph options like:
You're right, PAO doesn't work on objects-into-creatures, and that is a hilari-sad writing fail, because they clearly tried to make it work but not enough to even sketch out a single statblock for pebble-to-solar.

But hey, maybe the ability to create your choice of 15-HD monster out of your pocket lint was fucked in the first place.
Kaelik wrote: Alter Self turns Dragons into people, because whatever.

All the X shape spells are pathetic, and don't let you actually turn into different creatures, because of arbitrary nonsense size restrictions that are backed into every spell for pretty much no reason.

Like, great, you have some shitty buff spells that aren't worth casting, but bring a disguise check too. What the fuck ever, you still can't use it for the things you might actually want to use Polymorph for.

But hey, Baleful Polymorph works, so Pathfinder fixed Polymorph, because after all Baleful Polymorph didn't work in 3e... oh wait.
Newsflash, you dim-witted asshole: Full casters are plenty powerful. Putting i giant permanent statbonus in the spells chapter is not good game design.

PF polymorph rules are actually playable. 3.5 polymorph rules are a fucking ridiculous mess and you know it.
Every time you play in a "low magic world" with D&D rules (or derivates), a unicorn steps on a kitten and an orphan drops his ice cream cone.
Koumei
Serious Badass
Posts: 13880
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: South Ausfailia

Post by Koumei »

PF polymorph rules are playable, but also shit, and if you want to do anything not on the list (like turning into an Undead or turning into an object) you need to create an entire new line of spells or just fuck off.

The 3.X polymorph rules were a terrible mess, but at least once you made your agreement on what isn't okay, the spells had the flexibility to basically turn you into the thing you expected to turn into.

As it is, PAO apparently exists as a spell in Pathfinder, and it is badly written and tucked away in the hopes that people just don't use it and instead make their Sorcerer learn five ___Shape spells that are all shit, and then when you DO use PAO, you can basically call up a function not found and cause the universe to implode or whatever happens when something says to use rules that don't actually exist.
Count Arioch the 28th wrote:There is NOTHING better than lesbians. Lesbians make everything better.
User avatar
Kaelik
ArchDemon of Rage
Posts: 14832
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Kaelik »

rasmuswagner wrote:Newsflash, you dim-witted asshole: Full casters are plenty powerful. Putting i giant permanent statbonus in the spells chapter is not good game design.
Polymorph Any Object being Permanent at level 15 can be dumb. Being able to double cast it for permanency is also dumb.

Guess what fuckface, you can still do that in fucking Pathfinder, just from the shitty selection of shitty buffs, instead of actual transformation.

None of that changes that Pathfinder doesn't actually have transformation magic that doesn't suck at any level, and 3e can in fact do that at levels 1-14 without permanent stat buffs.
rasmuswagner wrote:PF polymorph rules are actually playable. 3.5 polymorph rules are a fucking ridiculous mess and you know it.
YEAH I DO KNOW! THAT'S WHY I SAID IT YOU IDIOT.

But Pathfinder is still worse. Because it's doesn't even do anything. It literally has a pile of bullshit buffs that aren't even transformation magic, and that arbitrarily limit your shape changing with bullshit size limitations.

And that's the point. It is really really really really really really hard to start from 3e polymorph and end up making it worse. But Pathfinder still did it, and that's pathetic.[/i]
DSMatticus wrote:Kaelik gonna kaelik. Whatcha gonna do?
The U.S. isn't a democracy and if you think it is, you are a rube.

That's libertarians for you - anarchists who want police protection from their slaves.
User avatar
virgil
King
Posts: 6339
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by virgil »

I couldn't help but notice Baleful Polymorph and its difference between Pathfinder and 3.X
  • 3E Total stat replacement except for Alignment, HP, HD for spell effects, known languages. In 24 hours, make a Will save or the only thing retained is alignment (HP/HD/language chance to match form). Equipment always falls off and is never transformed.
    Pathfinder Retain all original stats except size and natural attacks. Also gain a boost to Dex & natural armor, & whatever abilities the form has that are on the Beast III list. You then immediate make a Will save, failure resulting in losing all Ex/Su/Sp abilities from your class as well as spellcasting (keep stuff like sneak attack). You also gain the new form's mental stats (keeping your physical stats), alignment, and all of their special abilities. Equipment is absorbed into your body, as per any other polymorph effect.
This makes baleful polymorph, for certain characters, a strict buff when used in Pathfinder.
Come see Sprockets & Serials
How do you confuse a barbarian?
Put a greatsword a maul and a greataxe in a room and ask them to take their pick
EXPLOSIVE RUNES!
User avatar
Kaelik
ArchDemon of Rage
Posts: 14832
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Kaelik »

virgil wrote:I couldn't help but notice Baleful Polymorph and its difference between Pathfinder and 3.X
  • 3E Total stat replacement except for Alignment, HP, HD for spell effects, known languages. In 24 hours, make a Will save or the only thing retained is alignment (HP/HD/language chance to match form). Equipment always falls off and is never transformed.
    Pathfinder Retain all original stats except size and natural attacks. Also gain a boost to Dex & natural armor, & whatever abilities the form has that are on the Beast III list. You then immediate make a Will save, failure resulting in losing all Ex/Su/Sp abilities from your class as well as spellcasting (keep stuff like sneak attack). You also gain the new form's mental stats (keeping your physical stats), alignment, and all of their special abilities. Equipment is absorbed into your body, as per any other polymorph effect.
This makes baleful polymorph, for certain characters, a strict buff when used in Pathfinder.
Wow... Just... Wow...

I just assumed they didn't change it because it was already all you could ever want from an offense polymorph spell.

But no, apparently Pathfinder had to fuck that up too. Hey does Flesh to Stone turn you into a Stone construct?
DSMatticus wrote:Kaelik gonna kaelik. Whatcha gonna do?
The U.S. isn't a democracy and if you think it is, you are a rube.

That's libertarians for you - anarchists who want police protection from their slaves.
User avatar
virgil
King
Posts: 6339
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by virgil »

Kaelik wrote:But no, apparently Pathfinder had to fuck that up too. Hey does Flesh to Stone turn you into a Stone construct?
Nope, they copied 3E's text verbatim.
Come see Sprockets & Serials
How do you confuse a barbarian?
Put a greatsword a maul and a greataxe in a room and ask them to take their pick
EXPLOSIVE RUNES!
Heaven's Thunder Hammer
Master
Posts: 225
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 4:01 am

Post by Heaven's Thunder Hammer »

Random tangent here - has anyone ever actually made Tiers out of the pathfinder classes? Or have a link to someone's attempt?
Mask_De_H
Duke
Posts: 1995
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 7:17 pm

Post by Mask_De_H »

Heaven's Thunder Hammer wrote:Random tangent here - has anyone ever actually made Tiers out of the pathfinder classes? Or have a link to someone's attempt?
4chan did, actually.
Last edited by Mask_De_H on Wed Feb 24, 2016 10:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
FrankTrollman wrote: Halfling women, as I'm sure you are aware, combine all the "fun" parts of pedophilia without any of the disturbing, illegal, or immoral parts.
K wrote:That being said, the usefulness of airships for society is still transporting cargo because it's an option that doesn't require a powerful wizard to show up for work on time instead of blowing the day in his harem of extraplanar sex demons/angels.
Chamomile wrote: See, it's because K's belief in leaving generation of individual monsters to GMs makes him Chaotic, whereas Frank's belief in the easier usability of monsters pre-generated by game designers makes him Lawful, and clearly these philosophies are so irreconcilable as to be best represented as fundamentally opposed metaphysical forces.
Whipstitch wrote:You're on a mad quest, dude. I'd sooner bet on Zeus getting bored and letting Sisyphus put down the fucking rock.
User avatar
Kaelik
ArchDemon of Rage
Posts: 14832
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Kaelik »

Minmax boards did it too, with predictable results (the same dumb shit as JaronK's original, but now in Pathfinder) http://www.minmaxboards.com/index.php?topic=11990.0
DSMatticus wrote:Kaelik gonna kaelik. Whatcha gonna do?
The U.S. isn't a democracy and if you think it is, you are a rube.

That's libertarians for you - anarchists who want police protection from their slaves.
Heaven's Thunder Hammer
Master
Posts: 225
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 4:01 am

Post by Heaven's Thunder Hammer »

Mask_De_H wrote:
Heaven's Thunder Hammer wrote:Random tangent here - has anyone ever actually made Tiers out of the pathfinder classes? Or have a link to someone's attempt?
4chan did, actually.
Thanks!
Kaelik wrote:Minmax boards did it too, with predictable results (the same dumb shit as JaronK's original, but now in Pathfinder) http://www.minmaxboards.com/index.php?topic=11990.0
Thanks! Also "same dumb shit" - what do you mean by that exactly? I vaguely remember some criticism of the idea of the tiers, but can't quite remember.
...You Lost Me
Duke
Posts: 1854
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 5:21 am

Post by ...You Lost Me »

The way tiers are determined doesn't accurately reflect the strengths of a class, for a variety of reasons. They also aren't good for gauging how a class is used/played in real games.
DSMatticus wrote:Again, look at this fucking map you moron. Take your finger and trace each country's coast, then trace its claim line. Even you - and I say that as someone who could not think less of your intelligence - should be able to tell that one of these things is not like the other.
Kaelik wrote:I invented saying mean things about Tussock.
Mask_De_H
Duke
Posts: 1995
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 7:17 pm

Post by Mask_De_H »

Balancing around how hard you can fuck the game in the ass given arbitrary optimization caps and the level of shit you can get past your MC, as opposed to things like build difficulty, ability to contribute to a party, swinging in a SGT or the equivalent, etc.

It's not a useful metric, especially when it turns into "Full casters, Sorcerer casters, Bard casters, Paladin casters and whatever martial(s) CharOp people jerk it to, martials CharOp people don't jerk it to."
FrankTrollman wrote: Halfling women, as I'm sure you are aware, combine all the "fun" parts of pedophilia without any of the disturbing, illegal, or immoral parts.
K wrote:That being said, the usefulness of airships for society is still transporting cargo because it's an option that doesn't require a powerful wizard to show up for work on time instead of blowing the day in his harem of extraplanar sex demons/angels.
Chamomile wrote: See, it's because K's belief in leaving generation of individual monsters to GMs makes him Chaotic, whereas Frank's belief in the easier usability of monsters pre-generated by game designers makes him Lawful, and clearly these philosophies are so irreconcilable as to be best represented as fundamentally opposed metaphysical forces.
Whipstitch wrote:You're on a mad quest, dude. I'd sooner bet on Zeus getting bored and letting Sisyphus put down the fucking rock.
User avatar
Kaelik
ArchDemon of Rage
Posts: 14832
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Kaelik »

Heaven's Thunder Hammer wrote:Thanks! Also "same dumb shit" - what do you mean by that exactly? I vaguely remember some criticism of the idea of the tiers, but can't quite remember.
There's like a thousand different criticisms.

1) JaronK's Tiers are full of shit, because he thinks Favored Souls are good and Beguilers are average, because he's an idiot. Or he thinks Factotums are cool, or whatever.

2) JaronK values classes based on how many times they break the game, instead of literally any sane metric at all.

3) The Tiers method of measuring shit has nothing to do with how well you can deal with level appropriate opposition. Having multiple not level appropriate things like a Bard or a Factotum is considered better than having a single level appropriate thing, like the Rogue.

4) JaronK plays in some super weird fucked up world where Factotums are allowed to have Item Familiars, use MM II rules to make a bat minion, use a 3.0 setting specific skill from a setting their not in, and use Alter Self to get spellcasting from other classes. But god forbid you suggest that Dread Necromancers could get a wand of Magic Circle for their Planar Binding spells, that's just nonsense! Basically, classes that he likes are allowed to do any damn rules exploit, but other classes he doesn't like are played by a retarded monkey who takes weapon focus with all his feats on a Dread Necromancer.
Last edited by Kaelik on Wed Feb 24, 2016 10:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
DSMatticus wrote:Kaelik gonna kaelik. Whatcha gonna do?
The U.S. isn't a democracy and if you think it is, you are a rube.

That's libertarians for you - anarchists who want police protection from their slaves.
Heaven's Thunder Hammer
Master
Posts: 225
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 4:01 am

Post by Heaven's Thunder Hammer »

Ah ok - that makes sense then, thanks for the explanation guys. :D
GâtFromKI
Knight-Baron
Posts: 513
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 10:14 am

Post by GâtFromKI »

Heaven's Thunder Hammer wrote:Random tangent here - has anyone ever actually made Tiers out of the pathfinder classes? Or have a link to someone's attempt?
The tier system in Pathfinder is simple:
good tier: full casters.
medium tier: 2/3 casters.
still playable tier: 1/2 casters.
NPC tier: non-casters.
User avatar
rasmuswagner
Knight-Baron
Posts: 705
Joined: Mon May 16, 2011 9:37 am
Location: Danmark

Post by rasmuswagner »

Kaelik wrote: None of that changes that Pathfinder doesn't actually have transformation magic that doesn't suck at any level, and 3e can in fact do that at levels 1-14 without permanent stat buffs.
rasmuswagner wrote:PF polymorph rules are actually playable. 3.5 polymorph rules are a fucking ridiculous mess and you know it.
YEAH I DO KNOW! THAT'S WHY I SAID IT YOU IDIOT.

But Pathfinder is still worse. Because it's doesn't even do anything. It literally has a pile of bullshit buffs that aren't even transformation magic, and that arbitrarily limit your shape changing with bullshit size limitations.
So what you want is magic that meets your arbitrary treshold of "is transformation magic", and like a neckbearded grognard, you demand stupid shit that has been proven repeatedly not to work, shit that is in fact obviously broken from first principles, except, you know, you want it fixed and working.
Last edited by rasmuswagner on Thu Feb 25, 2016 9:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
Every time you play in a "low magic world" with D&D rules (or derivates), a unicorn steps on a kitten and an orphan drops his ice cream cone.
MGuy
Prince
Posts: 4795
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 5:18 am
Location: Indiana

Post by MGuy »

rasmuswagner wrote:
Kaelik wrote: None of that changes that Pathfinder doesn't actually have transformation magic that doesn't suck at any level, and 3e can in fact do that at levels 1-14 without permanent stat buffs.
rasmuswagner wrote:PF polymorph rules are actually playable. 3.5 polymorph rules are a fucking ridiculous mess and you know it.
YEAH I DO KNOW! THAT'S WHY I SAID IT YOU IDIOT.

But Pathfinder is still worse. Because it's doesn't even do anything. It literally has a pile of bullshit buffs that aren't even transformation magic, and that arbitrarily limit your shape changing with bullshit size limitations.
So what you want is magic that meets your arbitrary treshold of "is transformation magic", and like a neckbearded grognard, you demand stupid shit that has been proven repeatedly not to work, shit that is in fact obviously broken from first principles, except, you know, you want it fixed and working.
What conversation are you reading?
The first rule of Fatclub. Don't Talk about Fatclub..
If you want a game modded right you have to mod it yourself.
Post Reply