I think someone haxxed Conservapedia.

Lago_AM3P · Post by **Lago_AM3P** » Thu Nov 22, 2007 4:40 am

http://www.conservapedia.com/Special:St ... ][br]Funny stuff.

cthulhu · Post by **cthulhu** » Thu Nov 22, 2007 6:12 am

Most viewed pages

1. Main Page‎ [1,917,534]
2. Homosexuality‎ [1,589,863]
3. Homosexuality and Hepatitis‎ [517,599]
4. Homosexuality and Promiscuity‎ [421,418]
5. Gay Bowel Syndrome‎ [396,712]
6. Homosexuality and Parasites‎ [391,909]
7. Homosexual Couples and Domestic Violence‎ [373,419]
8. Homosexuality and Gonorrhea‎ [331,774]
9. Homosexuality and Mental Health‎ [292,893]
10. Homosexual Agenda‎ [271,194]

FUNNIEST SHIT EVER.

Draco_Argentum · Post by **Draco_Argentum** » Thu Nov 22, 2007 11:02 am

Nice find.

Koumei · Post by **Koumei** » Thu Nov 22, 2007 11:18 am

Awesome

Lago_AM3P · Post by **Lago_AM3P** » Fri Nov 23, 2007 1:24 am

Assuming this wasn't haxxed, anyone care to speculate the reason for these numbers?

I have my own theories but I'm a mean ol' cuss so I'll go last.

Count Arioch the 28th · Fri Nov 23, 2007 1:31 am

I should edit the page of some conservative dude and say he enjoys farting into his cupped hand, then bringing his hand swiftly to his nose to sample the aromas.

JonSetanta · Post by **JonSetanta** » Fri Nov 23, 2007 9:02 am

Gay.. bowel.. syndrome...

Oh, and here's a related vid to your comment, Count. Sortof.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=OVnbhugCWCA& ... related[br]

Crissa · Post by **Crissa** » Sat Nov 24, 2007 3:54 am

Those are just stats from their engine, which is generally acceptable.

The reason for those numbers is that several 'name' conservatives have used conservapedia entry on Gay Bowel Syndrome* as bibliography. So that leads to more reading of those pages.

Since the site is, unpopular made-up bunk, it's just showing how crappy the site really is. And how focused conservatives are on bowels.

-Crissa

* Gay Bowel Syndrome was a precursor diagnosis to AIDS; as HIV lowers the immune system, that lead to a greater incident of sexually transmitted diseases and other infections in the bowels.

Kinda like a 'duh' statement, really.

tzor · Post by **tzor** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 12:13 am

Crissa at [unixtime wrote:1195876484[/unixtime]]Since the site is, unpopular made-up bunk, it's just showing how crappy the site really is. And how focused conservatives are on bowels.

Honestly I'm still surprised that so many conseratives have access to the internet, or own computers, or a cellphone. Who would have thought?

Lago_AM3P · Post by **Lago_AM3P** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 5:30 am

Yeah, as funny as it would be to not be hax, I think someone is actually playing with the website.

Today's statistics:

Main Pageý [1,942,455]
Homosexualityý [1,650,886]
Homosexuality and Hepatitisý [518,284]
Homosexuality and Parasitesý [452,844]
Homosexuality and Promiscuityý [422,433]
Gay Bowel Syndromeý [403,481]
Homosexual Couples and Domestic Violenceý [374,309]
Homosexuality and Gonorrheaý [332,204]
Homosexuality and Anal Cancerý [294,664]
Homosexuality and Mental Healthý [294,071]

Such there's a huge increase of viewing of certain categories without a corresponding increase in the other categories, this is strong evidence of someone fooling around with the website.

Oh, well.

Crissa · Post by **Crissa** » Tue Nov 27, 2007 12:41 am

Hello? Did you read my reply?

It's a small website that doesn't have many hits at all, that's quoted as a source in several bibliographies for Gay Bowel Disease. It is the only contemporary source cited - as the term basically died out in the mid seventies.

No hax. They're just that lame. There's no evidence that there was a specific 'burst' in usage statistics.

-Crissa

Lago PARANOIA · Post by **Lago PARANOIA** » Fri Oct 31, 2008 7:32 am

* Atheism (4,476,739)
* Main Page (3,746,029)
* Homosexuality (3,202,261)
* Barack Obama (645,735)
* Wikipedia (597,115)
* John McCain (545,979)
* Sarah Palin (504,304)
* Joseph Biden (491,979)
* United States Presidential Election, 2008 (489,925)
* Liberal (484,266)

lol, looks like SOMEONE has been scrubbing their website. :8D

Prak · Post by **Prak** » Fri Oct 31, 2008 7:15 pm

well, that was fun... until a self-righteous ass of a mod IP blocked me because I corrected their page on satan...

It's kinda hard to ask a mod why you were banned on a wiki, ain't it?

edit: But it's not difficult to create a new account... apparently I haven't been IP banned... fun.

edit: Ok, now I've been IP blocked... I can't even create a new account... messing with christians is a lot more fun in RL...

Judging__Eagle · Post by **Judging__Eagle** » Sat Nov 01, 2008 12:02 am

Prak_Anima wrote:well, that was fun... until a self-righteous ass of a mod IP blocked me because I corrected their page on satan...

It's kinda hard to ask a mod why you were banned on a wiki, ain't it?

edit: But it's not difficult to create a new account... apparently I haven't been IP banned... fun.

edit: Ok, now I've been IP blocked... I can't even create a new account... messing with christians is a lot more fun in RL...

IP masking?

Prak · Post by **Prak** » Sat Nov 01, 2008 12:25 am

Judging__Eagle wrote:
Prak_Anima wrote:well, that was fun... until a self-righteous ass of a mod IP blocked me because I corrected their page on satan...

It's kinda hard to ask a mod why you were banned on a wiki, ain't it?

edit: But it's not difficult to create a new account... apparently I haven't been IP banned... fun.

edit: Ok, now I've been IP blocked... I can't even create a new account... messing with christians is a lot more fun in RL...
IP masking?

Wuzzut?

Draco_Argentum · Post by **Draco_Argentum** » Sat Nov 01, 2008 6:40 am

Use a proxy. Google it if you want to know how.

Cynic · Post by **Cynic** » Sat Nov 01, 2008 6:43 am

Prak_Anima wrote:
Judging__Eagle wrote:
Prak_Anima wrote:well, that was fun... until a self-righteous ass of a mod IP blocked me because I corrected their page on satan...

It's kinda hard to ask a mod why you were banned on a wiki, ain't it?

edit: But it's not difficult to create a new account... apparently I haven't been IP banned... fun. :flames:

edit: Ok, now I've been IP blocked... I can't even create a new account... messing with christians is a lot more fun in RL...
IP masking?
Wuzzut?

http://www.conservapedia.com/IP_Masking

Why? just look it up on their great encyclopedia. :-D

Crissa · Post by **Crissa** » Sat Nov 01, 2008 6:47 am

What did you fix?

-Crissa

Prak · Post by **Prak** » Sat Nov 01, 2008 10:01 pm

factual errors on their "Theistic Satanism" and Satan pages, and expanded on some theories for Lucifer's fall on the Satan Page.

Crissa · Post by **Crissa** » Sun Nov 02, 2008 2:11 pm

Factual errors on a .... How do you get it wrong, exactly? Choose the wrong book? How is this even relevant to anything in the world that should be i an encyclopedia?

-Crissa

Bigode · Post by **Bigode** » Sun Nov 02, 2008 7:51 pm

Crissa wrote:Factual errors on a .... How do you get it wrong, exactly? Choose the wrong book? How is this even relevant to anything in the world that should be i an encyclopedia?

This' certainly relevant enough to deserve space in an encyclopedia, but I dunno the relevance for Conservapedia. And one could get it wrong by explaining a single view as being the only view, for example.

Crissa · Post by **Crissa** » Sun Nov 02, 2008 10:10 pm

Bigode wrote:And one could get it wrong by explaining a single view as being the only view, for example.

Even I'm not dense enough to not know that's the point of Conservopedia. To get things wrong from a single point of view.

-Crissa

Bigode · Post by **Bigode** » Sun Nov 02, 2008 10:13 pm

Crissa wrote:
Bigode wrote:And one could get it wrong by explaining a single view as being the only view, for example.
Even I'm not dense enough to not know that's the point of Conservopedia. To get things wrong from a single point of view.

LOL - but I suppose that for "an encyclopedia", my points stand.

Prak · Post by **Prak** » Mon Nov 03, 2008 12:28 am

To be honest, it's more about playing Devil's Advocate on the satan page, on the theistic satanism page, however, it's about stopping Libel.

Username17 · Post by **Username17** » Mon Nov 03, 2008 12:30 pm

Prak_Anima wrote:To be honest, it's more about playing Devil's Advocate on the satan page, on the theistic satanism page, however, it's about stopping Libel.

But without Libel, why would they even need conservapedia?

-Username17

The Gaming Den

I think someone haxxed Conservapedia.

I think someone haxxed Conservapedia.

Re: I think someone haxxed Conservapedia.

Re: I think someone haxxed Conservapedia.

Re: I think someone haxxed Conservapedia.

Re: I think someone haxxed Conservapedia.

Re: I think someone haxxed Conservapedia.

Re: I think someone haxxed Conservapedia.

Re: I think someone haxxed Conservapedia.

Re: I think someone haxxed Conservapedia.

Re: I think someone haxxed Conservapedia.

Re: I think someone haxxed Conservapedia.