RANT: No one has taken America away from anyone
Moderator: Moderators
- Count Arioch the 28th
- King
- Posts: 6172
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
RANT: No one has taken America away from anyone
Alright, here's my rant.
Obama did not "take" America from anyone. Americans chose to elect him.
If Obama doesn't get re-elected, no one "took America back". America chose to elect someone else.
For that matter, Bush didn't "take" the role of President his first term. He received a majority of the electoral votes and was deemed the winner. Several presidents have lost popular vote but won electoral vote. (This rant is not meant for either side, so in the interest of fairness I'll throw something that liberals bitched about).
Also, the founding fathers made a direct effort to keep people like me out of the political process. Any invocation of them is not likely to change my mind about anything (Not to say that I don't find them fascinating as individuals, on the contrary!)
Obama did not "take" America from anyone. Americans chose to elect him.
If Obama doesn't get re-elected, no one "took America back". America chose to elect someone else.
For that matter, Bush didn't "take" the role of President his first term. He received a majority of the electoral votes and was deemed the winner. Several presidents have lost popular vote but won electoral vote. (This rant is not meant for either side, so in the interest of fairness I'll throw something that liberals bitched about).
Also, the founding fathers made a direct effort to keep people like me out of the political process. Any invocation of them is not likely to change my mind about anything (Not to say that I don't find them fascinating as individuals, on the contrary!)
In this moment, I am Ur-phoric. Not because of any phony god’s blessing. But because, I am enlightened by my int score.
- Count Arioch the 28th
- King
- Posts: 6172
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
- Psychic Robot
- Prince
- Posts: 4607
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 10:47 pm
That's a pretty tame rant.
Retards?There is exactly one group of people that can claim America was taken from them.
Count Arioch wrote:I'm not sure how discussions on whether PR is a terrible person or not is on-topic.
Ant wrote:You do not seem to do anything.Chamomile wrote:Ant, what do we do about Psychic Robot?
"Americans chose to elect him" is a bit generous...most Americans didn't vote for Obama. In addition, there was only one more option presented.
When your presented with "more war, more deficit spending" or "more war, more deficit spending", and you're forced to have one of those, I'm not really convinced you can say you have a choice.
When your presented with "more war, more deficit spending" or "more war, more deficit spending", and you're forced to have one of those, I'm not really convinced you can say you have a choice.
Kaelik, to Tzor wrote: And you aren't shot in the face?
Frank Trollman wrote:A government is also immortal ...On the plus side, once the United Kingdom is no longer united, the United States of America will be the oldest country in the world. USA!
- angelfromanotherpin
- Overlord
- Posts: 9745
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
What.Doom wrote:"Americans chose to elect him" is a bit generous...most Americans didn't vote for Obama.
http://www.fec.gov/pubrec/fe2008/2008presgeresults.pdf
- PoliteNewb
- Duke
- Posts: 1053
- Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2009 1:23 am
- Location: Alaska
- Contact:
What I think he's getting at is that 69.5 million Americans (give or take) voted for Obama, while 237.5 million Americans (based on a population I got off Google) did not.angelfromanotherpin wrote:What.Doom wrote:"Americans chose to elect him" is a bit generous...most Americans didn't vote for Obama.
http://www.fec.gov/pubrec/fe2008/2008presgeresults.pdf
Granted, most of the Americans who didn't vote for Obama didn't vote for anyone (and may not have been able to, for various reasons including youth). Then again, even people who cast votes for Obama may have been voting more "Against McCain" than "For Obama".
TL;DR just because a guy won doesn't mean that most of America wants him...it just means he won. In some cases, it just means he was the least insulting choice on the plate.
Not trying to put words in Doom's mouth, but that's what I got out of his statement. He can correct/clarify if he likes.
I think he means these guysPR wrote:Retards?There is exactly one group of people that can claim America was taken from them.
Last edited by PoliteNewb on Wed Jan 19, 2011 10:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I am judging the philosophies and decisions you have presented in this thread. The ones I have seen look bad, and also appear to be the fruit of a poisonous tree that has produced only madness and will continue to produce only madness.
--AngelFromAnotherPin
believe in one hand and shit in the other and see which ones fills up quicker. it will be the one you are full of, shit.
--Shadzar
--AngelFromAnotherPin
believe in one hand and shit in the other and see which ones fills up quicker. it will be the one you are full of, shit.
--Shadzar
- Psychic Robot
- Prince
- Posts: 4607
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 10:47 pm
- Psychic Robot
- Prince
- Posts: 4607
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 10:47 pm
Technically, we took it away from the British Parliment. It's not like any British Citizen could say, "hey, that little piece of land over there is mine." In fact we got pissed off at the King because he let parliment do shit that no true Englishman would stand. (That and the fact that he couldn't speak a word of English ... old German George.) Once we managed to get a treaty John Adams as Ambassador was eager to diplomatically kiss his ass ... as equals of course.Koumei wrote:Americans took America away from the British.
I honestly don't get it.Psychic Robot wrote:[...]mandatory voting
Edit: Maybe you're talking about the US shit that complains about how informal votes in australia are bad, or coercive or some shit, whereas our high informal vote rate is created almost entirely by people who have per socioeconomic status, i.e. they cannot fill out the paper correctly because they are bad at reading.
On the plus side, your can legally tell your employer 'fuck you' and go vote on a work day and he has to give you time off, and the election is on the weekend, and Australians start a riot if they have to wait more than 1 hour to vote - how long do people in the poor areas in the US have to wait? Yeah, like 8 hours.
Last edited by cthulhu on Thu Jan 20, 2011 2:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- King
- Posts: 6403
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Where do you get that idea? I mean you could make some sort of "history would be completely different" butterfly effect argument.Koumei wrote:I have full confidence, that under British rule it would only be an order of magnitude worse.
But aside from that if you look at the actual outcome of history and what the British empire became you get things like, well, Australia.
Australia is a seriously better place to live than the USA, and we stayed under British rule, and technically still ARE under British rule.
Hell. The UK (strangely) remained under British rule and I would TOTALLY live there before living in the USA, even despite the shittier weather.
The USA is a total shit hole of a nation and most of the top western members of the Commonwealth are much cooler kids to hang out with.
Another highly relevant example. Canada.
Rule Brittania etc.. etc...
Phonelobster's Self Proclaimed Greatest Hits Collection : (no really, they are awesome)
Phonelobster's Latest RPG Rule Set
The world's most definitive Star Wars Saga Edition Review
That Time I reviewed D20Modern Classes
Stories from Phonelobster's ridiculous life about local gaming stores, board game clubs and brothels
Australia is a horror setting thread
Phonelobster's totally legit history of the island of Malta
The utterly infamous Our Favourite Edition Is 2nd Edition thread
The world's most definitive Star Wars Saga Edition Review
That Time I reviewed D20Modern Classes
Stories from Phonelobster's ridiculous life about local gaming stores, board game clubs and brothels
Australia is a horror setting thread
Phonelobster's totally legit history of the island of Malta
The utterly infamous Our Favourite Edition Is 2nd Edition thread
- Psychic Robot
- Prince
- Posts: 4607
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 10:47 pm
You can't force people to vote.I honestly don't get it.
Australia is a seriously better place to live than the USA
Ahahahaha. Enjoy your libtard fantasyland.Another highly relevant example. Canada.
Count Arioch wrote:I'm not sure how discussions on whether PR is a terrible person or not is on-topic.
Ant wrote:You do not seem to do anything.Chamomile wrote:Ant, what do we do about Psychic Robot?
-
- King
- Posts: 6403
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
What? We may not be perfect but we DO have health care, functional welfare, a less violent society, a more modern less corrupt system of government, a healthier more pleasant culture, and nicer food.
And you could say that of Australia, the UK, and Canada.
The idea that the USA is a better place to live in than any of those countries is one held only by drooling US "exceptionalists" (AKA Nationalistic scum) who absolutely spit in the face of history and evidence in general.
If I get sick I can go see my GP without concern that it will bankrupt me. I pay a very modest sum once a fucking year and the rest is god damn FREE.
So hey, we "at least" have our health, you don't have that, WTF do you have again?
And you could say that of Australia, the UK, and Canada.
The idea that the USA is a better place to live in than any of those countries is one held only by drooling US "exceptionalists" (AKA Nationalistic scum) who absolutely spit in the face of history and evidence in general.
If I get sick I can go see my GP without concern that it will bankrupt me. I pay a very modest sum once a fucking year and the rest is god damn FREE.
So hey, we "at least" have our health, you don't have that, WTF do you have again?
Last edited by PhoneLobster on Thu Jan 20, 2011 3:14 am, edited 1 time in total.
Phonelobster's Self Proclaimed Greatest Hits Collection : (no really, they are awesome)
Phonelobster's Latest RPG Rule Set
The world's most definitive Star Wars Saga Edition Review
That Time I reviewed D20Modern Classes
Stories from Phonelobster's ridiculous life about local gaming stores, board game clubs and brothels
Australia is a horror setting thread
Phonelobster's totally legit history of the island of Malta
The utterly infamous Our Favourite Edition Is 2nd Edition thread
The world's most definitive Star Wars Saga Edition Review
That Time I reviewed D20Modern Classes
Stories from Phonelobster's ridiculous life about local gaming stores, board game clubs and brothels
Australia is a horror setting thread
Phonelobster's totally legit history of the island of Malta
The utterly infamous Our Favourite Edition Is 2nd Edition thread
Britain basically losing that war was probably a good thing.
If nothing else, now people have the right attitude about royalty (they don't mean anything).
If nothing else, now people have the right attitude about royalty (they don't mean anything).
He jumps like a damned dragoon, and charges into battle fighting rather insane monsters with little more than his bare hands and rather nasty spell effects conjured up solely through knowledge and the local plantlife. He unerringly knows where his goal lies, he breathes underwater and is untroubled by space travel, seems to have no limits to his actual endurance and favors killing his enemies by driving both boots square into their skull. His agility is unmatched, and his strength legendary, able to fling about a turtle shell big enough to contain a man with enough force to barrel down a near endless path of unfortunates.
--The horror of Mario
Zak S, Zak Smith, Dndwithpornstars, Zak Sabbath. He is a terrible person and a hack at writing and art. His cultural contributions are less than Justin Bieber's, and he's a shitmuffin. Go go gadget Googlebomb!
--The horror of Mario
Zak S, Zak Smith, Dndwithpornstars, Zak Sabbath. He is a terrible person and a hack at writing and art. His cultural contributions are less than Justin Bieber's, and he's a shitmuffin. Go go gadget Googlebomb!
- CatharzGodfoot
- King
- Posts: 5668
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
- Location: North Carolina
Instant runnoff leads to some strange ways of gaming the system. Approval voting (probably means the same thing as "preferential") really makes more sense; not in the least because the standard (one person one vote) is its degenerate case.cthulhu wrote:It's why you need mandatory voting and preferential or instant runoff voting.
Blam.
The law in its majestic equality forbids the rich as well as the poor from stealing bread, begging and sleeping under bridges.
-Anatole France
Mount Flamethrower on rear
Drive in reverse
Win Game.
-Josh Kablack
-Anatole France
Mount Flamethrower on rear
Drive in reverse
Win Game.
-Josh Kablack
None of the ways of gaming the system to produce a non concordat winner have ever been demonstrated in practice in Australia. The concordat winner has always actually won. Which means I'm totally fine with the niche issues that IRV has over preferential. No tactical voting campaign has also ever been demonstrated to actually have an effect either.
I used to think approval voting was a big deal over instant run off but then I realized it's a waste of time as a practical matter. A or B is equally good, who gives a shit. Both are way better than first past the post.
Australia does have a higher informal vote, but it appears that's mostly because people cannot read and our ballot papers are excessively complex - see the titanic drop in informal voting when above the line voting was introduced in the senate, and the strong link between informal voting and socioeconomic status of the region.
I used to think approval voting was a big deal over instant run off but then I realized it's a waste of time as a practical matter. A or B is equally good, who gives a shit. Both are way better than first past the post.
Surprisingly you can. Just making it a requirement to vote appears to result in people saying 'fuck, maybe I better watch some TV news or some shit' and then generally casting a vote. In Australia all it takes to get out of the $50 dollar fine is writing a letter saying 'I felt sick and my dog died' which no-one checks, yet most people go vote. (Note: This doesn't actually make them any more informed than Joe Citizen anywhere else.. but meh)You can't force people to vote.
Australia does have a higher informal vote, but it appears that's mostly because people cannot read and our ballot papers are excessively complex - see the titanic drop in informal voting when above the line voting was introduced in the senate, and the strong link between informal voting and socioeconomic status of the region.
Last edited by cthulhu on Thu Jan 20, 2011 3:53 am, edited 2 times in total.
- Psychic Robot
- Prince
- Posts: 4607
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 10:47 pm
Freedom of speech. (Lolpwnt.)WTF do you have again?
My point is that would cause a shitstorm in America.Surprisingly you can.
Count Arioch wrote:I'm not sure how discussions on whether PR is a terrible person or not is on-topic.
Ant wrote:You do not seem to do anything.Chamomile wrote:Ant, what do we do about Psychic Robot?
To be honest, the number one issue America has is rampant gerrymandering. The political system may actually be more corrupted that Northern Ireland during the troubles.
But yeah, the coercive thing occasionally gets some airplay here, but the 'most serious' political figures to advance that mandatory voting is bad because it is coercive recently:
* Mark Latham
* Nick Minchin
Anyone who follows Australian politics knows how laughable any pronouncement either one of those two make is, so the 2-1 combo is fucking amazing.
But yeah, the coercive thing occasionally gets some airplay here, but the 'most serious' political figures to advance that mandatory voting is bad because it is coercive recently:
* Mark Latham
* Nick Minchin
Anyone who follows Australian politics knows how laughable any pronouncement either one of those two make is, so the 2-1 combo is fucking amazing.
Re: RANT: No one has taken America away from anyone
Without delving too deep into the minutia I was under the impression that Gore actually received the most votes in Florida, and if the count/recount process wasn't so flawed he would have carried the state.Count Arioch the 28th wrote: For that matter, Bush didn't "take" the role of President his first term. He received a majority of the electoral votes and was deemed the winner.