Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2014 8:48 pm
...and that's before you get to bloodlines!
Welcome to the Gaming Den.
http://www.tgdmb.com/phpBB3/
As someone who fairly regularly runs five-way political struggles, I can confirm that it is chaos however it is not bordering on impossible to run. It does take a lot of prep-work, though, and if you aren't in the habit of spending a month planning a campaign before you start recruiting for it (like I am) it might not be a good idea. Also: Chaos is awesome.TheFlatline wrote:Not to mention that a 5 way political struggle doesn't look like intrigue and a cold war mentality, it looks like chaos. You have like 120 different permutations of faction alliance possibilities alone. Not to mention keeping track of potentially 120 different ways all the political factions can ally/piss in each other's cheerios is really fucking hard for a storyteller to do, bordering on impossible.
Most of the political Vampire games I played in this isn't an absolute truth. Maybe a 50% of the time truth (50% of the time it works 100% of the time!). Secret fuck-you grudges while openly being allies and vice versa were like plot twist 101.FrankTrollman wrote:120 is actually 5!, which isn't particularly relevant to the situation. For starters, if the Invictis was enemies with the Carthians, you would expect that reverse to also be true.
But it's a monster game! Where would you find a human political faction that wants to, say, force the arrival of their god by acting on thousand years old apocalyptical prophecies so that everybody but them dies horribly?hyzmarca wrote:Personally, I'd just avoid monster political factions altogether and have monsters covertly integrated with human politics and economy. Thus instead of Camarilla and Sabbat you have Democrats and Republicans. This also helps avoid human politics and society becoming completely irrelevant.
This is not a good idea. At all. Real politics is something people care about. Saying "I'm a Tzimisce and I WILL EAT THIS KITTEN!" is fun and games, and just ends with people laughing and going on with their business. Saying "I'm a Republican and I WILL EAT THIS WELLFARE!" is a good way to get non-republicans in the group angry with you over a period of time.hyzmarca wrote:Personally, I'd just avoid monster political factions altogether and have monsters covertly integrated with human politics and economy. Thus instead of Camarilla and Sabbat you have Democrats and Republicans. This also helps avoid human politics and society becoming completely irrelevant.
I don't mean that Republicans are literally the Sabbat. I mean that monsters advance their policy goals through mortal institutions and apparatuses rather than the alternative that mortal institutions and apparatuses are completely useless and exist only to make the cattle feel important.Longes wrote:This is not a good idea. At all. Real politics is something people care about. Saying "I'm a Tzimisce and I WILL EAT THIS KITTEN!" is fun and games, and just ends with people laughing and going on with their business. Saying "I'm a Republican and I WILL EAT THIS WELLFARE!" is a good way to get non-republicans in the group angry with you over a period of time.hyzmarca wrote:Personally, I'd just avoid monster political factions altogether and have monsters covertly integrated with human politics and economy. Thus instead of Camarilla and Sabbat you have Democrats and Republicans. This also helps avoid human politics and society becoming completely irrelevant.
TL;DR: don't bring up politics at a gaming table ever.