The Gaming Den

Actually, I took a look at the Gunslinger rules, and noticed something interesting - Advanced Firearms. Ignore the "misfire" column on the chart - the text specifically says that Advanced Firearms do not misfire. Also, they count as touch attacks for five range increments, not just one, a...

The APG archetypes for rogue have something rogues should have from day 1, like poison use. Has PF continued the proud D&D tradition of not only making poisons mechanicly shitty, but also stressing that poisons are so horrible, cruel and unfair that only Chaotic Evil baby eating, puppy raping H...

Somebody at Paizo has a mad hate-on for rogues, and I can't figure out why. Likely. See the PF society traits. They are all decent, barring the rogue one wich is sucky in a disturbing manner. Overall, everything is reduced to this: if you don't give enough class feature to a class, you don't know w...

And I'm sure everyone here is jumping at the chance to apply !. Roy, now's your chance to live the dream and rub shoulders with Paizo's finest! :lol: If I applied, all the Paizils would run in fear from my name. Which would be funny and all, but then they wouldn't be around to continue amusing me. ...

Several people think that I'm quite insane - but more on the Psychotic side (see my avatar name, is referred to the manga 3x3 eyes). Eh, nevermind Yeah, I think you are right. Or at least, barring the fact that one could or could not think that mounted combat is low or high level, this is arbitrary....

And PR is obviously calling you a sociopath uber. Is this supposed to somewhat unnerve me? I agree on the ride thing. Well actually on the long road does not affect fighters because of armor training and mithral, but it affects paladins, as an example, unless you use a specific ACF Making the point...

If you hang around here long enough, you'll realize any optimizers that venture into the Tea Party headquarters are being very nice compared to us. Both in terms of actually being nice, and in terms of conservative optimization. :confused: does not seem to me that, say, K had such condiscending beh...

Hi Paizils. Hi Roy! How do you do? See, works like a charm. Are you having fun over there? I'm having fun watching the trainwreck going on. I couldn't resist.. but I'm not having fun, nor I want to troll you Roy. :mrgreen: I don't even disagree on everything with MG, by I find his way of interact w...

Roy wrote: Hi Paizils.

Hi Roy! How do you do?

[ I believe you've heard the term 'meatshield' before. Casters shouldn't need melee protection, and melees shouldn't need casters to be effective. Further thought: Picking and choosing what spells get their time increased will be entertaining. As I stated above, they should swear to plan spells stu...

That means no one ever gets a spell off. "He's casting! STAB HIM!" Well, this should motivate more melees to protect them. If alone, the spellcasters should spent more effort, and more spell, to get a combo that keeps them protected, unnoticed, and able to cast. This COULD lead to a great...

Thank you K. I don't agree, at least at the same level, with many people here, but what has been done is unfair. :nonono: On this route, I doubt things will end well (see people complaining about editing and stuff). To finally answer to you: IMO, many problems could have been fixed without feared gr...

Sorry for jumping this way mid-thread.. I'm a Paizo "fanboy" (no, not true). I want to ask to K if is true the thread is "Wizard Winning Tactics". If true, I could be slightly pissed off with Paizo. Because even if not visible on the thread, you can find K's answers looking for K...