Not really? It's a spell, it does what it says it does, and no more. And it says it works on spells that enchant projectiles like align weapon and greater magic weapon, which work on 50 projectileS. A literal interpretation of the text therefore rules out named bullet, on the grounds that named bullet does not work on projectiles plural but only a projectile singular, unlike the spells enumerated which are specified as working with Abundant Ammunition.Prak_Anima wrote:So what? Abundant Ammo pretty explicitly clones the ammo in the quiver. There is a vague case that can be made for your argument, but it's pretty damned dumb.
The dumb thing is using 50 named bullets, which looks very much like wishful thinking to me, as named bullet is very much not like the spells listed, as it doesn't enchant projectiles but a single projectile. A pretty big difference, like the difference between suffocate (level 5) and mass suffocate (level 9).
I think reading the spell, it's pretty clear - especially in the knowledge that there are lots of spells that actually are like align weapon which presumably are the ones Abundant Ammunition is actually talking about. Spells like Daybreak Arrow, or Flame Arrow. It could be better written with less ambiguous language I suppose, but that particular combo still looks like wishful thinking in my mind.
Yeah, I can see where enthusiastic game breakers can possibly blag an alternative reading into it, but only if you are quite generous with your inferences and assume that them referring specifically to the plural is merely an artifact of the English language. Sure, I guess? It's blaggable. But I don't see why any GM would ever be forgiving about this particular inference given a) it's obviously pretty broken b) obviously against the spirit of the spell and c) not even compatible with a literal interpretation of what the spell says or the examples given.